Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Run a single experiment iteration. Edit the target file, evaluate, keep or discard. Use when the user runs /ar:run or asks for one manual autoresearch iteration.
.claude/skills/alirezarezvani-run/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -60% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -59% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -28% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -31% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -32% | 0% |
Run the full AgentHub lifecycle in one command: initialize, capture baseline, spawn agents, evaluate results, and merge the winner.
/hub:run --task "Reduce p50 latency" --agents 3 \
--eval "pytest bench.py --json" --metric p50_ms --direction lower \
--template optimizer
/hub:run --task "Refactor auth module" --agents 2 --template refactorer
/hub:run --task "Cover untested utils" --agents 3 \
--eval "pytest --cov=utils --cov-report=json" --metric coverage_pct --direction higher \
--template test-writer
/hub:run --task "Write 3 email subject lines for spring sale campaign" --agents 3 --judge| Parameter | Required | Description | |-----------|----------|-------------| | --task | Yes | Task description for agents | | --agents | No | Number of parallel agents (default: 3) | | --eval | No | Eval command to measure results (skip for LLM judge mode) | | --metric | No | Metric name to extract from eval output (required if --eval given) | | --direction | No | lower or higher — which direction is better (required if --metric given) | | --template | No | Agent template: optimizer, refactorer, test-writer, bug-fixer |
Execute these steps sequentially:
Run /hub:hub-init with the provided arguments:
bashpython {skill_path}/scripts/hub_init.py \ --task "{task}" --agents {N} \ [--eval "{eval_cmd}"] [--metric {metric}] [--direction {direction}]
Display the session ID to the user.
If --eval was provided:
Baseline captured: {metric} = {value}baseline: {value} to .agenthub/sessions/{session-id}/config.yamlIf no --eval was provided, skip this step.
Run /hub:spawn with the session ID.
If --template was provided, use the template dispatch prompt from ../agenthub/references/agent-templates.md instead of the default dispatch prompt. Pass the eval command, metric, and baseline to the template variables.
Launch all agents in a single message with multiple Agent tool calls (true parallelism).
After spawning, inform the user that agents are running. When all agents complete (Agent tool returns results):
Run /hub:eval with the session ID:
--eval was provided: metric-based ranking with result_ranker.py--eval: LLM judge mode (coordinator reads diffs and ranks)If baseline was captured, pass --baseline {value} to result_ranker.py so deltas are shown.
Display the ranked results table.
Present the results to the user and ask for confirmation:
Agent-2 is the winner (128ms, -52ms from baseline).
Merge agent-2's branch? [Y/n]If confirmed, run /hub:merge. If declined, inform the user they can:
/hub:merge --agent agent-{N} to pick a different winner/hub:eval --judge to re-evaluate with LLM judge--template, agents use the default dispatch prompt from /hub:spawn| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 16,468 | 16,525 | +0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 398 | 1,400 | +252% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 14,274 | 15,468 | +8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 300 | 1,253 | +318% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 17,303 | 17,965 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 267 | 1,332 | +399% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 24,059 | 3,295 | -86% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,368 | 1,342 | -60% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 26,243 | 8,338 | -68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,055 | 1,665 | -59% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 17,681 | 8,257 | -53% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,109 | 1,523 | -28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | 19,572 | 10,668 | -45% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,496 | 2,020 | -19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 16,321 | 7,244 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,825 | 1,257 | -31% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 15,248 | 7,992 | -48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,823 | 1,492 | -18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 17,708 | 7,223 | -59% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,018 | 1,366 | -32% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 20,300 | 13,153 | -35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,488 | 2,344 | -6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 16,356 | 6,334 | -61% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,122 | 1,169 | -45% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 14,758 | 8,661 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,286 | 1,490 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 16,260 | 4,995 | -69% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,579 | 1,642 | +4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 20,139 | 4,905 | -76% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,314 | 1,916 | -17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 7,135 | 2,094 | -71% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 992 | 1,330 | +34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 15,385 | 4,290 | -72% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,656 | 1,618 | -2% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 19,016 | 1,467 | -92% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,193 | 1,197 | -45% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | 14,879 | 1,676 | -89% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,502 | 1,224 | -19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | 9,531 | 8,666 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 217 | 1,683 | +676% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 20,218 | 19,361 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,618 | 2,939 | +82% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 9,812 | 21,790 | +122% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,978 | 3,693 | +87% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 18 counted toward the lift figure. The other 4 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +45 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 18 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
| Model | Method | Date | Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-3.6-flash | verified | 8/11/2026 | +45% |
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.