Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →aperivue/write-protocol
IRB/ethics committee research protocol generator. Produces 4 core sections (Background, Study Design, Sample Size, Statistical Plan) with full prose, plus 6 skeleton sections with TODO markers for institution-specific content. Integrates outputs from design-study, calc-sample-size, and search-lit.
Passed 6 of 18 test cases with the skill, and 2 of 18 without it.
and 8 more in the full report
5 fixed2 passed either way14 still failing1 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
This benchmark measured an earlier version of the skill.
A newer attempt on gemini-3.6-flash on 10/3/2026 did not produce a publishable comparison (not comparable). The snapshot above is the previously measured run.
One of 5 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
I need an ethics-ready medical research protocol document generated for my study on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease progression. My primary hypothesis is that baseline serum ferritin levels predict 5-year progression to liver fibrosis in adult patients diagnosed with NAFLD. This is a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records from major urban medical centers between 2015 and 2023. The primary endpoint is biopsy-confirmed or transient elastography-confirmed hepatic fibrosis, while secondary outcomes include overall mortality and metabolic complications. Please assemble a comprehensive protocol markdown file that drafts full scientific prose for background, methodology, power calculations, and analysis plans, while leaving structured placeholder markers for site-specific items like local IRB forms, budgeting, and institutional timelines.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Section 1 Background and Rationale contains no bullet points. | Missed | Passed |
| Output contains all 10 numbered protocol sections from Section 1 through Section 10. | Missed | Passed |
| Section 5 contains a [TODO] placeholder marker. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Draft the scientific core of an IRB/ethics protocol and leave institution-specific sections as
[TODO] skeletons. Read both reference files before generating a protocol draft:
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/protocol_template.md -- the 10-section structure, per-section
guidance, and the [TODO] blocks for Sections 5-9${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/ethics_checklist.md -- jurisdiction-specific ethical requirementsCollect the required inputs before generating; ask for any that are missing.
Use prior skill outputs directly when they exist; when they do not, ask the user or call the skill:
protocol/sample_size_justification.md (canonical IRB-ready prose) and
protocol/sample_size_calc.{R,py} (reproducible code).variable_operationalization.md -- literature-grounded definitions,
cutoffs, DB-variable mappings for the Methods section. Precondition: if the study is
observational and no operationalization artifact exists, call /define-variables before
drafting Methods. Do not invent phenotype/cutoff definitions from the data dictionary inside
this skill.Full paragraphs, no bullet points, flowing from clinical context (disease burden, current
test cases passed, vs 2 / 18 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.