Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Communications-domain literature review with Claude-style knowledge-base-first retrieval. Use when the task is about communications, wireless, networking, satellite/NTN, Wi-Fi, cellular, transport protocols, congestion control, routing, scheduling, MAC/PHY, rate adaptation, channel estimation, beamforming, or communication-system research and the user wants papers, related work, a survey, or a landscape summary. Search Zotero, Obsidian, and local paper folders first when available, then search I
.claude/skills/aris-comm-lit-review/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-20 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Research topic: $ARGUMENTS
Use this skill for communications-domain literature review when the topic is about:
4G/5G/6G, NR, NTNLEO, GEO, integrated space-air-ground systemsACM, HARQ, CSI feedbackIf the center of gravity is generic ML architecture research, pure control theory without communications literature, or software/API documentation rather than papers, fall back to a general literature skill.
papers/ in the current projectliterature/ in the current projectCLAUDE.md under ## Paper LibraryParse $ARGUMENTS for a — sources: directive.
— sources: is specified, only search the listed sources.zoteroobsidianlocalieeesciencedirectacmwebValid source values:
zoteroobsidianlocalieeesciencedirectacmweballIf all is specified, interpret it as the full default source set.
This is a knowledge-base-first skill. Search in this order unless the user overrides it:
ZoteroObsidianpapers/ and literature/IEEE XploreScienceDirectACM Digital LibraryGraceful degradation rules:
For external search:
IEEE Xplore firstScienceDirectACMPublication policy:
workshoppreprintTime-window policy:
foundational: before 2022recent: 2022 to presentWithin each database tier, search venue tiers in this order.
Journals:
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications (JSAC)IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (ToN)IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications (TWC)IEEE Transactions on Communications (TCOM)Conferences:
ACM SIGCOMMUSENIX NSDIACM MobiComACM CoNEXTIEEE INFOCOMJournals:
IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology (TVT)IEEE Wireless Communications Letters (WCL)IEEE Communications LettersComputer NetworksComputer CommunicationsAd Hoc NetworksPhysical CommunicationConferences:
IEEE ICCIEEE GLOBECOMIEEE WCNCIEEE PIMRCACM MobiHocUsage rules:
only top venues, top journals only, or top conferences only, treat Tier A as a hard filterSkip this step if Zotero MCP is not configured or zotero is not enabled.
If available:
Skip this step if Obsidian MCP is not configured or obsidian is not enabled.
If available:
Run this step if local is enabled.
papers/**/*.pdf and literature/**/*.pdfUse a layered search strategy. For communications topics, avoid random blog posts or tertiary summaries.
Database ladder:
ieeexplore.ieee.orgsciencedirect.comdl.acm.orgMove to the next database tier only when:
Within each database tier:
For each relevant paper, capture:
zotero, obsidian, local, ieee, sciencedirect, acm, or webFavor concrete numbers, assumptions, and problem definitions over generic paraphrases.
Do not collapse transport-layer rate control and PHY/MAC rate adaptation into one bucket without saying so explicitly.
Group papers by technical axis rather than by search order. Common groupings:
PHY/MAC adaptationNTN and satellite resource managementWhen useful, explicitly separate:
If evidence is weak, say so instead of smoothing it over.
Use a literature table with these columns:
| Paper | Venue | Year | Layer | Scenario | Method | Key Result | Limitation | Relevance | Source | |---|---|---:|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Source should indicate where the paper came from first:
zoteroobsidianlocalieeesciencedirectacmwebAfter the table, summarize in this order:
2-4 approachesEnd with Practical Takeaway:
IEEE and ScienceDirect first, ACM second, and only then broader web search unless the user asks otherwise.| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-23 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted, and 20 counted toward the lift figure. The other 3 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +35 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 20 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.