Design and conduct mixed methods research using convergent, explanatory sequential, or exploratory sequential strategies with genuine integration of qualitative and quantitative strands.
SkillScore95Maintained
Automatic
◆Research pack
Last verified 8/28/2026
What it changes
Passed 21 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 18 of 22 without it.
Without skill82%
With skill95%
Checks it passed that the model alone missed
Classifies the design as Convergent with QUAL+QUANT priority.
Recommends connecting data through joint displays or meta-inferences.
Categorizes convergence using confirmed, complementary, and divergent entries.
and 2 more in the full report
4 fixed17 passed either way0 still failing1 broke
Pass-rate lift
+14 pp
Tokens
+21%
Agent turns
0%
Response time
-21%
Model gemini-3.6-flashMeasured 8/28/2026v121 of 22 cases passed with skill
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
See it in action
One of 4 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
1 of 4
Prompt
We recently evaluated our hospital's new patient portal rollout. We collected platform usage analytics across 5,000 patients showing a sharp decline in logins, followed by 20 semi-structured interviews with patients to understand the drop-off. I need a comprehensive mixed-methods research synthesis of these findings. Please structure the report with a research design specification section, detailed breakdowns of both the quantitative statistics and qualitative themes, a joint display matrix mapping statistical outcomes directly to qualitative insights, a convergence section categorizing points of agreement/complementarity/conflict, and final meta-inferences synthesized across both strands.
What was checked, without and with the skill
Checked
Without skill
With skill
Classifies the research design as Explanatory Sequential with QUANT->qual priority.
Passed
Passed
Includes a joint display table with Quantitative Finding, Qualitative Finding, and Meta-Inference columns.
Passed
Passed
Includes convergence categories for confirmed, complementary, and divergent findings.
Missed
Passed
case-01 · gemini-3.6-flash · 8/28/2026 · answers are capped and redacted
What's inside
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
SKILL.md115 linessingle file
Mixed Methods Research
Overview
Mixed methods research combines qualitative and quantitative approaches within a single study or program of inquiry to leverage the strengths of both. Grounded in pragmatism, it selects methods based on what works best for the research question. The defining feature is not merely using both approaches but genuinely integrating them at design, methods, or interpretation levels to produce insights neither approach could achieve alone.
When to Use
A single approach (qual or quant alone) cannot adequately address the research question
Quantitative results need qualitative explanation (why did the effect occur?)
Qualitative findings need quantitative testing (does the pattern generalize?)
Complex phenomena require both breadth (quant) and depth (qual) of understanding
When NOT to Use
When the research question can be fully addressed by one approach
When the researcher lacks competence in either qualitative or quantitative methods
When resources (time, funding, team) cannot support both strands adequately
When the paradigmatic assumptions of qual and quant are irreconcilable for the specific study
Assumptions
IRON LAW: Mixed methods requires GENUINE INTEGRATION — running qual
and quant in parallel without connecting findings is NOT mixed methods,
it is two separate studies stapled together. Integration must occur at
design, methods, or interpretation level.
Key assumptions:
Pragmatism as the philosophical foundation — what works for the research question determines the method
Both qualitative and quantitative data have legitimate claims to knowledge
Integration is the defining feature — not merely combining, but connecting, merging, or embedding
The research question drives design choice, not methodological allegiance
Apply network economics to analyze markets with network effects, critical mass dynamics, and platform competition. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate tipping points, lock-in risks, switching costs, or standards wars, especially in technology platforms and two-sided markets.