Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →avizmarlon/observability-when-to-add
Instrumentation is directed, not preventive — add observability only when confirmed pain exists. Follow industry standards (OpenTelemetry, structured logging, performance.now()).
Passed 22 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 14 of 22 without it.
and 10 more in the full report
8 fixed14 passed either way0 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 8 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
A developer working locally needs to measure execution time of a tricky algorithm inside a TypeScript function before submitting code. Should they integrate a distributed tracing SDK or use something temporary?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Recommends language builtin utilities like console.time and console.timeEnd | Missed | Passed |
| Advises discarding the temporary timing code after resolving the issue | Passed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Industry principle (Google SRE Book, Honeycomb, Charity Majors): instrumentation carries maintenance cost proportional to its value. Every metric is code to maintain, schema that can break, storage cost, and signal to interpret. You instrument when you have confirmed pain, not "just in case."
jq/grep. Add correlation_id if the call crosses process boundaries.console.time/console.timeEnd in JavaScript, time.perf_counter() in Python, etc.). Discard after resolving the issue.Instrument boundaries, not internals
Aggressive sampling in production
Telemetry failure must not cascade
test cases passed, vs 14 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.