Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Debug Azure production issues on Azure using AppLens, Azure Monitor, resource health, and safe triage. WHEN: debug production issues, troubleshoot app service, app service high CPU, app service deployment failure, troubleshoot container apps, troubleshoot functions, troubleshoot AKS, kubectl cannot connect, kube-system/CoreDNS failures, pod pending, crashloop, node not ready, upgrade failures, analyze logs, KQL, insights, image pull failures, cold start issues, health probe failures, resource he
.claude/skills/azure-diagnostics/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
> AUTHORITATIVE GUIDANCE — MANDATORY COMPLIANCE > > This document is the official source for debugging and troubleshooting Azure production issues. Follow these instructions to diagnose and resolve common Azure service problems systematically.
Activate this skill when user wants to:
| Service | Common Issues | Reference | |---------|---------------|-----------| | Container Apps | Image pull failures, cold starts, health probes, port mismatches | container-apps/ | | App Service | High CPU, deployment failures, crashes, slow responses, TLS/custom domains | app-service/ | | Function Apps | App details, invocation failures, timeouts, binding errors, cold starts, missing app settings | functions/ | | AKS | Cluster access, nodes, kube-system, scheduling, crash loops, ingress, DNS, upgrades | AKS Troubleshooting | | Messaging | Event Hubs & Service Bus SDK errors, AMQP failures, message lock, connectivity | Messaging Troubleshooting |
bash# Check resource health az resource show --ids RESOURCE_ID # View activity log az monitor activity-log list -g RG --max-events 20 # Container Apps logs az containerapp logs show --name APP -g RG --follow # Function App logs (query App Insights traces) az monitor app-insights query --apps APP-INSIGHTS -g RG \ --analytics-query "traces | where timestamp > ago(1h) | order by timestamp desc | take 50"
For AI-powered diagnostics, use:
mcp_azure_mcp_applens
intent: "diagnose issues with <resource-name>"
command: "diagnose"
parameters:
resourceId: "<resource-id>"
Provides:
- Automated issue detection
- Root cause analysis
- Remediation recommendationsFor querying logs and metrics:
mcp_azure_mcp_monitor
intent: "query logs for <resource-name>"
command: "logs_query"
parameters:
workspaceId: "<workspace-id>"
query: "<KQL-query>"See kql-queries.md for common diagnostic queries.
mcp_azure_mcp_resourcehealth
intent: "check health status of <resource-name>"
command: "get"
parameters:
resourceId: "<resource-id>"bash# Check specific resource health az resource show --ids RESOURCE_ID # Check recent activity az monitor activity-log list -g RG --max-events 20
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +41 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.