Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Call HLA alleles from NGS data using OptiType, HLA-HD, or arcasHLA for immunogenomics applications. Use when determining HLA genotype for transplant matching, neoantigen prediction, or pharmacogenomic screening.
.claude/skills/bio-clinical-databases-hla-typing/SKILL.md| Model | Eval pass | Runs |
|---|---|---|
| gemini-3.6-flash | 100% | 7 |
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-15 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
Reference examples tested with: OptiType 1.3+, STAR 2.7.11+, pandas 2.2+, samtools 1.19+
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
pip show <package> then help(module.function) to check signatures<tool> --version then <tool> --help to confirm flagsIf code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.
"Determine HLA genotype from my sequencing data" → Call HLA alleles from WGS/WES/RNA-seq reads for transplant matching, neoantigen prediction, or pharmacogenomic screening.
OptiType for HLA class I typing from DNA/RNA readsarcasHLA extract → arcasHLA genotype for RNA-seq based typingGoal: Call HLA Class I alleles (HLA-A, B, C) at 4-field resolution from WGS, WES, or RNA-seq data.
Approach: Extract HLA region reads from BAM, then run OptiType's integer linear programming algorithm to determine optimal allele assignment.
bash# Extract HLA reads from BAM samtools view -h input.bam chr6:28000000-34000000 | \ samtools fastq -1 hla_R1.fq -2 hla_R2.fq - # Run OptiType OptiTypePipeline.py \ -i hla_R1.fq hla_R2.fq \ -d \ -o optitype_output \ -c config.ini # Output: optitype_output/sample_result.tsv # Contains HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C alleles (4-field resolution)
bash# RNA mode OptiTypePipeline.py \ -i rna_R1.fq rna_R2.fq \ -r \ -o optitype_rna_output \ -c config.ini
ini# config.ini [mapping] razers3=/path/to/razers3 threads=4 [ilp] solver=glpk threads=4 [behavior] deletebam=true unpaired_weight=0 use_discordant=false
Goal: Perform high-resolution HLA typing for both Class I and Class II loci from WGS/WES data.
Approach: Extract HLA-region reads, then run HLA-HD which uses Bowtie2 mapping against the IPD-IMGT/HLA database.
bash# HLA-HD for high-resolution typing # Supports Class I and Class II # Extract HLA reads samtools view -b input.bam chr6:28000000-34000000 > hla_region.bam samtools sort -n hla_region.bam -o hla_sorted.bam samtools fastq -1 hla_R1.fq -2 hla_R2.fq hla_sorted.bam # Run HLA-HD hlahd.sh \ -t 8 \ -m 100 \ -f freq_data \ hla_R1.fq \ hla_R2.fq \ gene_split_filt \ dictionary \ sample_name \ output_dir # Output includes HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, DQB1, DPB1 at 4-field resolution
Goal: Genotype HLA alleles directly from RNA-seq BAM files aligned with STAR.
Approach: Extract HLA-mapped reads with arcasHLA extract, then genotype using an EM algorithm against the IMGT/HLA database.
bash# Fast HLA typing from RNA-seq # Extracts and genotypes in one step # From STAR-aligned BAM arcasHLA extract sample.bam -o output_dir arcasHLA genotype output_dir/sample.extracted.fq.gz -o output_dir # Output: sample.genotype.json # { # "A": ["A*02:01", "A*24:02"], # "B": ["B*35:01", "B*44:03"], # "C": ["C*04:01", "C*05:01"] # }
bash# Merge multiple samples arcasHLA merge output_dir/*.genotype.json -o merged_hla.tsv
HLA-A*02:01:01:01
| | | |
| | | +-- Non-coding variation (optional)
| | +----- Synonymous variation (optional)
| +-------- Protein sequence (usually reported)
+----------- Allele group
Resolution levels:
- 2-field: A*02:01 (protein sequence - clinical standard)
- 4-field: A*02:01:01 (includes synonymous changes)
- Full: A*02:01:01:01 (includes non-coding)Goal: Screen patient HLA alleles for known drug hypersensitivity associations.
Approach: Cross-reference called HLA alleles against a curated table of HLA-drug adverse reaction associations.
python# Key HLA-drug associations HLA_DRUG_ASSOCIATIONS = { 'B*57:01': { 'drug': 'Abacavir', 'reaction': 'Hypersensitivity syndrome', 'screening': 'Required before prescribing' }, 'B*15:02': { 'drug': 'Carbamazepine', 'reaction': 'SJS/TEN', 'populations': 'High risk in Han Chinese, Southeast Asian' }, 'B*58:01': { 'drug': 'Allopurinol', 'reaction': 'SJS/TEN', 'populations': 'High risk in Han Chinese, Korean, Thai' }, 'A*31:01': { 'drug': 'Carbamazepine', 'reaction': 'DRESS', 'populations': 'European, Japanese' } } def check_hla_drug_risk(hla_alleles, drug): '''Check if patient HLA poses drug reaction risk''' risks = [] for allele in hla_alleles: if allele in HLA_DRUG_ASSOCIATIONS: assoc = HLA_DRUG_ASSOCIATIONS[allele] if assoc['drug'].lower() == drug.lower(): risks.append({ 'allele': allele, 'drug': drug, 'reaction': assoc['reaction'] }) return risks
Goal: Parse OptiType TSV output into structured HLA calls and format for clinical reporting.
Approach: Read the tab-separated result file and extract allele pairs for each HLA locus.
pythonimport pandas as pd def parse_optitype(result_file): '''Parse OptiType TSV output''' df = pd.read_csv(result_file, sep='\t') # Columns: A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, C2, Reads, Objective hla_calls = { 'HLA-A': [df['A1'].iloc[0], df['A2'].iloc[0]], 'HLA-B': [df['B1'].iloc[0], df['B2'].iloc[0]], 'HLA-C': [df['C1'].iloc[0], df['C2'].iloc[0]] } return hla_calls def format_hla_report(hla_calls): '''Format HLA calls for clinical report''' report = [] for gene, alleles in hla_calls.items(): allele_str = '/'.join(sorted(set(alleles))) report.append(f'{gene}: {allele_str}') return '\n'.join(report)
| Class | Genes | Function | Typing Priority | |-------|-------|----------|-----------------| | Class I | HLA-A, B, C | Present intracellular peptides | Neoantigen, PGx | | Class II | HLA-DR, DQ, DP | Present extracellular peptides | Transplant, autoimmune |
| Tool | Input | Classes | Resolution | Speed | |------|-------|---------|------------|-------| | OptiType | WGS/WES/RNA | I only | 4-field | Fast | | HLA-HD | WGS/WES | I and II | 4-field | Moderate | | arcasHLA | RNA-seq | I and II | 4-field | Fast | | HLA-LA | WGS | I and II | 4-field | Slow |
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 21 counted toward the lift figure. The other 1 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +18 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 21 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.