Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Extract and analyze mutational signatures from somatic variants using SigProfiler or MutationalPatterns to characterize mutagenic processes. Use when identifying DNA damage mechanisms or etiology in cancer genomes.
.claude/skills/bio-clinical-databases-somatic-signatures/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-07 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
| case-08 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
| case-09 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
Reference examples tested with: MutationalPatterns 3.12+, SigProfilerExtractor 1.1+, numpy 1.26+
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
pip show <package> then help(module.function) to check signaturespackageVersion('<pkg>') then ?function_name to verify parametersIf code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.
"Extract mutational signatures from my tumor samples" → Decompose somatic mutation catalogs into mutational signatures (SBS, DBS, ID) to identify DNA damage mechanisms and mutagenic processes in cancer genomes.
SigProfilerExtractor.sigpro() for de novo signature extractionMutationalPatterns::fit_to_signatures() for fitting to COSMIC signaturesGoal: Extract de novo mutational signatures and decompose to COSMIC reference signatures from somatic VCFs.
Approach: Generate a 96-trinucleotide-context mutation matrix with SigProfilerMatrixGenerator, extract signatures via NMF with SigProfilerExtractor, and fit to COSMIC with SigProfilerAssignment.
pythonfrom SigProfilerMatrixGenerator import install as genInstall from SigProfilerMatrixGenerator.scripts import SigProfilerMatrixGeneratorFunc as matGen # Install reference genome (one-time) genInstall.install('GRCh38') # Generate mutational matrix from VCF # Input: Directory containing VCF files # Output: SBS96 matrix (96 trinucleotide contexts) matrices = matGen.SigProfilerMatrixGeneratorFunc( project='my_project', genome='GRCh38', vcfFiles='/path/to/vcf_directory', plot=True, exome=False # Set True for WES )
pythonfrom SigProfilerExtractor import sigpro as sig # De novo signature extraction # Determines optimal number of signatures automatically sig.sigProfilerExtractor( input_type='matrix', output='extraction_output', input_data='my_project/output/SBS/my_project.SBS96.all', reference_genome='GRCh38', minimum_signatures=1, maximum_signatures=10, nmf_replicates=100, cpu=-1 # Use all cores )
pythonfrom SigProfilerAssignment import Analyzer as Analyze # Fit to known COSMIC signatures Analyze.cosmic_fit( samples='my_project/output/SBS/my_project.SBS96.all', output='assignment_output', input_type='matrix', genome_build='GRCh38', signature_database='SBS_GRCh38_GRCh38' )
Goal: Analyze mutational spectra and fit to COSMIC signatures using the MutationalPatterns R package.
Approach: Load VCFs as GRanges, generate a 96-context mutation matrix against the reference genome, then fit to known COSMIC signatures or extract de novo via NMF.
rlibrary(MutationalPatterns) library(BSgenome.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38) # Load VCF files vcf_files <- list.files('vcf_dir', pattern = '\\.vcf$', full.names = TRUE) sample_names <- gsub('.vcf', '', basename(vcf_files)) vcfs <- read_vcfs_as_granges( vcf_files, sample_names, ref_genome = 'BSgenome.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38' ) # Generate 96-context mutation matrix mut_mat <- mut_matrix(vcf_list = vcfs, ref_genome = 'BSgenome.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38') # Visualize spectrum plot_96_profile(mut_mat)
r# Load COSMIC signatures (v3.2) cosmic_sigs <- get_known_signatures(muttype = 'snv') # Fit samples to signatures fit_result <- fit_to_signatures(mut_mat, cosmic_sigs) # Plot contribution plot_contribution(fit_result$contribution, cosmic_sigs, mode = 'absolute') # Relative contribution plot_contribution(fit_result$contribution, cosmic_sigs, mode = 'relative')
r# Extract de novo signatures using NMF # Determine optimal rank estimate <- estimate_rank(mut_mat, rank_range = 2:8, nrun = 50) plot(estimate) # Extract signatures nmf_res <- extract_signatures(mut_mat, rank = 4, nrun = 100) # Compare to COSMIC cos_sim <- cos_sim_matrix(nmf_res$signatures, cosmic_sigs) plot_cosine_heatmap(cos_sim)
Goal: Interpret extracted signatures by mapping them to known mutagenic processes (e.g., UV, smoking, MMR deficiency).
Approach: Look up each dominant signature in a COSMIC etiology reference table and filter by contribution threshold.
python# Common COSMIC signatures and their etiologies SIGNATURE_ETIOLOGY = { 'SBS1': 'Spontaneous deamination (age-related)', 'SBS2': 'APOBEC activity', 'SBS3': 'Defective HR/BRCA1/2', 'SBS4': 'Tobacco smoking', 'SBS5': 'Unknown (age-related)', 'SBS6': 'MMR deficiency', 'SBS7a': 'UV exposure', 'SBS7b': 'UV exposure', 'SBS10a': 'POLE mutation', 'SBS10b': 'POLE mutation', 'SBS13': 'APOBEC activity', 'SBS15': 'MMR deficiency', 'SBS17a': 'Unknown', 'SBS17b': 'Unknown', 'SBS18': 'ROS damage', 'SBS22': 'Aristolochic acid', 'SBS26': 'MMR deficiency', 'SBS44': 'MMR deficiency', } def interpret_signatures(contributions): '''Interpret signature contributions''' interpretations = [] for sig, contrib in contributions.items(): if contrib > 0.05: # >5% contribution threshold etiology = SIGNATURE_ETIOLOGY.get(sig, 'Unknown') interpretations.append({ 'signature': sig, 'contribution': contrib, 'etiology': etiology }) return sorted(interpretations, key=lambda x: x['contribution'], reverse=True)
| Category | Signatures | Mechanism | |----------|------------|-----------| | Age-related | SBS1, SBS5 | Spontaneous deamination, clock-like | | APOBEC | SBS2, SBS13 | Cytidine deaminase activity | | MMR deficiency | SBS6, SBS15, SBS26, SBS44 | Mismatch repair defects | | HR deficiency | SBS3 | BRCA1/2, homologous recombination | | POLE mutation | SBS10a, SBS10b | Proofreading defects | | UV damage | SBS7a, SBS7b | Pyrimidine dimers | | Smoking | SBS4 | Tobacco carcinogens | | Platinum therapy | SBS31, SBS35 | Treatment-related |
Goal: Quantify how closely an extracted signature matches a COSMIC reference signature.
Approach: Compute cosine similarity between the two 96-dimensional signature vectors.
pythonimport numpy as np def cosine_similarity(sig1, sig2): '''Calculate cosine similarity between two signatures''' dot_product = np.dot(sig1, sig2) norm1 = np.linalg.norm(sig1) norm2 = np.linalg.norm(sig2) return dot_product / (norm1 * norm2) # Threshold: >0.8 considered similar # >0.9 considered same signature
Goal: Translate dominant mutational signatures into actionable clinical recommendations (e.g., PARP inhibitor eligibility).
Approach: Map signature identities to therapy implications and recommended confirmatory tests.
pythondef signature_clinical_implications(dominant_signatures): '''Clinical implications of mutational signatures''' implications = [] for sig in dominant_signatures: if sig == 'SBS3': implications.append({ 'signature': 'SBS3', 'implication': 'HR deficiency - may respond to PARP inhibitors', 'testing': 'Consider BRCA1/2 testing' }) elif sig in ['SBS6', 'SBS15', 'SBS26', 'SBS44']: implications.append({ 'signature': sig, 'implication': 'MMR deficiency - may respond to immunotherapy', 'testing': 'Consider MSI testing' }) elif sig in ['SBS2', 'SBS13']: implications.append({ 'signature': sig, 'implication': 'APOBEC activity - associated with high TMB', 'testing': 'Consider TMB assessment' }) return implications
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +9 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.