Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Quality control for pooled CRISPR screens. Covers library representation, read distribution, replicate correlation, and essential gene recovery. Use when assessing screen quality before hit calling or diagnosing poor screen performance.
.claude/skills/bio-crispr-screens-screen-qc/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Reference examples tested with: MAGeCK 0.5+, matplotlib 3.8+, numpy 1.26+, pandas 2.2+, scikit-learn 1.4+, seaborn 0.13+
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
pip show <package> then help(module.function) to check signaturesIf code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.
"Check the quality of my CRISPR screen" → Assess screen quality through library representation, Gini index, replicate correlation, and essential gene recovery metrics before hit calling.
pandas + matplotlib for QC metrics and diagnostic plotspythonimport pandas as pd import numpy as np import matplotlib.pyplot as plt import seaborn as sns # Load MAGeCK count output counts = pd.read_csv('screen.count.txt', sep='\t', index_col=0) genes = counts['Gene'] count_matrix = counts.drop('Gene', axis=1) print(f'sgRNAs: {len(count_matrix)}') print(f'Genes: {genes.nunique()}') print(f'Samples: {count_matrix.columns.tolist()}')
Goal: Assess whether the sgRNA library is adequately represented across all samples.
Approach: Count zero-count and low-count sgRNAs per sample, flagging samples where dropout exceeds quality thresholds (>1% zero-count is warning, >5% is failure).
python# Zero-count sgRNAs per sample zero_counts = (count_matrix == 0).sum() zero_pct = zero_counts / len(count_matrix) * 100 print('Zero-count sgRNAs per sample:') for sample, pct in zero_pct.items(): status = 'OK' if pct < 1 else 'WARNING' if pct < 5 else 'FAIL' print(f' {sample}: {pct:.2f}% [{status}]') # Low-count sgRNAs (<30 reads) low_counts = (count_matrix < 30).sum() low_pct = low_counts / len(count_matrix) * 100 print('\nLow-count sgRNAs (<30 reads):') for sample, pct in low_pct.items(): print(f' {sample}: {pct:.2f}%')
Goal: Quantify how evenly reads are distributed across sgRNAs within each sample.
Approach: Calculate the Gini index (0 = perfect equality, 1 = complete inequality) from sorted non-zero counts, where values below 0.2 indicate good uniformity.
pythondef gini_index(x): '''Calculate Gini index (0=perfect equality, 1=complete inequality)''' x = np.sort(x[x > 0]) n = len(x) cumx = np.cumsum(x) return (n + 1 - 2 * np.sum(cumx) / cumx[-1]) / n gini_values = count_matrix.apply(gini_index) print('\nGini index per sample (lower is better, <0.2 ideal):') for sample, gini in gini_values.items(): status = 'OK' if gini < 0.2 else 'WARNING' if gini < 0.3 else 'FAIL' print(f' {sample}: {gini:.3f} [{status}]')
pythonfig, axes = plt.subplots(1, 2, figsize=(12, 5)) # Log read count distribution for sample in count_matrix.columns: log_counts = np.log10(count_matrix[sample] + 1) axes[0].hist(log_counts, bins=50, alpha=0.5, label=sample) axes[0].set_xlabel('Log10(counts + 1)') axes[0].set_ylabel('sgRNAs') axes[0].set_title('Read Count Distribution') axes[0].legend() # Cumulative distribution for sample in count_matrix.columns: sorted_counts = np.sort(count_matrix[sample])[::-1] cumsum = np.cumsum(sorted_counts) / sorted_counts.sum() axes[1].plot(np.arange(len(cumsum)) / len(cumsum) * 100, cumsum * 100, label=sample) axes[1].set_xlabel('% of sgRNAs (ranked)') axes[1].set_ylabel('% of total reads') axes[1].set_title('Cumulative Read Distribution') axes[1].legend() plt.tight_layout() plt.savefig('qc_distribution.png', dpi=150)
Goal: Verify that biological and technical replicates are concordant.
Approach: Compute pairwise Pearson correlations on log-transformed counts, display as a heatmap, and flag replicate pairs with correlation below 0.8.
python# Correlation matrix log_counts = np.log10(count_matrix + 1) corr_matrix = log_counts.corr() plt.figure(figsize=(8, 6)) sns.heatmap(corr_matrix, annot=True, cmap='RdYlBu_r', vmin=0.5, vmax=1, square=True, fmt='.2f') plt.title('Replicate Correlation (log10 counts)') plt.tight_layout() plt.savefig('qc_correlation.png', dpi=150) # Check replicate pairs print('\nReplicate correlations:') for i, col1 in enumerate(count_matrix.columns): for col2 in count_matrix.columns[i+1:]: r = corr_matrix.loc[col1, col2] status = 'OK' if r > 0.8 else 'WARNING' if r > 0.6 else 'FAIL' print(f' {col1} vs {col2}: r={r:.3f} [{status}]')
Goal: Confirm that the screen detects known essential genes as a positive control for screen quality.
Approach: Load reference essential gene sets, score genes by MAGeCK negative-selection rank, and compute the AUROC for separating essential from non-essential genes.
python# Load known essential genes (e.g., from Hart et al. or DepMap) essential_genes = set(pd.read_csv('essential_genes.txt', header=None)[0]) nonessential_genes = set(pd.read_csv('nonessential_genes.txt', header=None)[0]) # Load MAGeCK results results = pd.read_csv('screen.gene_summary.txt', sep='\t') # Check recovery in T0 vs later timepoint present_essential = results[results['id'].isin(essential_genes)] present_nonessential = results[results['id'].isin(nonessential_genes)] # ROC-like analysis from sklearn.metrics import roc_auc_score y_true = results['id'].isin(essential_genes).astype(int) y_score = -results['neg|score'] # More negative = more essential if y_true.sum() > 0: auc = roc_auc_score(y_true, y_score) print(f'\nEssential gene recovery AUC: {auc:.3f}') status = 'EXCELLENT' if auc > 0.9 else 'GOOD' if auc > 0.8 else 'FAIR' if auc > 0.7 else 'POOR' print(f'Status: {status}')
python# sgRNAs per gene sgrnas_per_gene = genes.value_counts() print(f'\nsgRNAs per gene: mean={sgrnas_per_gene.mean():.1f}, min={sgrnas_per_gene.min()}, max={sgrnas_per_gene.max()}') # Check for genes with few sgRNAs few_sgrnas = sgrnas_per_gene[sgrnas_per_gene < 3] if len(few_sgrnas) > 0: print(f'WARNING: {len(few_sgrnas)} genes have <3 sgRNAs')
python# Total reads per sample total_reads = count_matrix.sum() print('\nTotal reads per sample:') for sample, total in total_reads.items(): print(f' {sample}: {total:,}') # Check for major imbalances cv = total_reads.std() / total_reads.mean() print(f'\nCoefficient of variation: {cv:.3f}') if cv > 0.5: print('WARNING: Large variation in sequencing depth')
Goal: Generate a comprehensive pass/fail QC summary for a CRISPR screen.
Approach: Aggregate zero-count percentage, mean Gini index, and minimum replicate correlation into a single report, applying quality thresholds to determine overall screen status.
pythondef generate_qc_report(count_matrix, genes): report = { 'total_sgrnas': len(count_matrix), 'total_genes': genes.nunique(), 'samples': len(count_matrix.columns), 'zero_count_pct': (count_matrix == 0).sum().mean() / len(count_matrix) * 100, 'gini_mean': count_matrix.apply(gini_index).mean(), 'replicate_corr_min': np.log10(count_matrix + 1).corr().min().min(), } print('=== QC Summary ===') for key, value in report.items(): if isinstance(value, float): print(f'{key}: {value:.3f}') else: print(f'{key}: {value}') # Overall status passes = [] passes.append(report['zero_count_pct'] < 5) passes.append(report['gini_mean'] < 0.25) passes.append(report['replicate_corr_min'] > 0.7) status = 'PASS' if all(passes) else 'FAIL' print(f'\nOverall QC: {status}') return report report = generate_qc_report(count_matrix, genes)
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +41 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.