Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Quality control, filtering, normalization, and feature selection for spatial transcriptomics data. Calculate QC metrics, filter spots/cells, normalize counts, and identify highly variable genes. Use when filtering and normalizing spatial transcriptomics data.
.claude/skills/bio-spatial-transcriptomics-spatial-preprocessing/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-17 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
Reference examples tested with: matplotlib 3.8+, numpy 1.26+, scanpy 1.10+, squidpy 1.3+
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
pip show <package> then help(module.function) to check signaturesIf code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.
"Preprocess my spatial transcriptomics data" → Calculate spatial QC metrics (genes/spot, mitochondrial fraction), filter spots by expression and tissue coverage, normalize, and select variable genes.
scanpy.pp.calculate_qc_metrics() → filter_cells() → normalize_total() on spatial AnnDataQC, filtering, normalization, and feature selection for spatial data.
pythonimport squidpy as sq import scanpy as sc import numpy as np import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
Goal: Compute per-spot and per-gene quality control statistics.
Approach: Use Scanpy's calculate_qc_metrics to generate total counts, gene counts, and other summary statistics.
python# Calculate standard QC metrics sc.pp.calculate_qc_metrics(adata, inplace=True) # View QC columns print(adata.obs[['total_counts', 'n_genes_by_counts']].describe()) print(adata.var[['total_counts', 'n_cells_by_counts']].describe())
Goal: Quantify mitochondrial gene expression as a quality indicator.
Approach: Flag MT-prefixed genes, then compute percentage of counts from mitochondrial genes per spot.
python# Mark mitochondrial genes adata.var['mt'] = adata.var_names.str.startswith('MT-') # Calculate percent mitochondrial sc.pp.calculate_qc_metrics(adata, qc_vars=['mt'], inplace=True) print(f"Mean MT%: {adata.obs['pct_counts_mt'].mean():.1f}")
Goal: Display QC metrics overlaid on tissue coordinates to identify spatial patterns in data quality.
Approach: Use Squidpy or Scanpy spatial plots with QC metric columns as color variables.
python# Plot QC metrics spatially sq.pl.spatial_scatter(adata, color=['total_counts', 'n_genes_by_counts', 'pct_counts_mt'], ncols=3) # Or with Scanpy sc.pl.spatial(adata, color=['total_counts', 'n_genes_by_counts'], spot_size=1.5)
pythonfig, axes = plt.subplots(1, 3, figsize=(12, 4)) axes[0].hist(adata.obs['total_counts'], bins=50) axes[0].set_xlabel('Total counts') axes[1].hist(adata.obs['n_genes_by_counts'], bins=50) axes[1].set_xlabel('Genes detected') axes[2].hist(adata.obs['pct_counts_mt'], bins=50) axes[2].set_xlabel('MT %') plt.tight_layout()
Goal: Remove low-quality spots based on count, gene, and mitochondrial thresholds.
Approach: Apply sequential filters for minimum counts, minimum genes, and maximum mitochondrial percentage.
python# Filter based on QC metrics print(f'Before filtering: {adata.n_obs} spots') # Minimum counts and genes sc.pp.filter_cells(adata, min_counts=500) sc.pp.filter_cells(adata, min_genes=200) # Maximum mitochondrial content adata = adata[adata.obs['pct_counts_mt'] < 20].copy() print(f'After filtering: {adata.n_obs} spots')
Goal: Remove lowly expressed genes detected in very few spots.
Approach: Apply a minimum cell count threshold to drop genes with negligible spatial coverage.
python# Remove genes detected in few spots print(f'Before filtering: {adata.n_vars} genes') sc.pp.filter_genes(adata, min_cells=10) print(f'After filtering: {adata.n_vars} genes')
Goal: Normalize count data to remove library size effects and prepare for downstream analysis.
Approach: Store raw counts as a layer, normalize to median total counts, then log-transform.
python# Store raw counts adata.layers['counts'] = adata.X.copy() # Normalize to median total counts sc.pp.normalize_total(adata, target_sum=1e4) # Log transform sc.pp.log1p(adata)
Goal: Apply variance-stabilizing normalization analogous to Seurat's SCTransform.
Approach: Compute Pearson residuals from raw counts using Scanpy's experimental module.
python# Pearson residuals normalization (similar to SCTransform) # Requires raw counts adata_raw = adata.copy() adata_raw.X = adata_raw.layers['counts'] sc.experimental.pp.normalize_pearson_residuals(adata_raw) adata.layers['pearson'] = adata_raw.X.copy()
Goal: Identify genes with high expression variability for feature selection.
Approach: Use Scanpy's HVG detection with the Seurat v3 flavor on raw count data.
python# Find HVGs sc.pp.highly_variable_genes(adata, n_top_genes=2000, flavor='seurat_v3', layer='counts') # View HVG stats print(f"Found {adata.var['highly_variable'].sum()} HVGs") sc.pl.highly_variable_genes(adata)
Goal: Identify genes whose expression varies significantly across tissue space.
Approach: Build a spatial neighbor graph, then compute Moran's I autocorrelation to rank genes by spatial variability.
python# Compute spatial neighbors first sq.gr.spatial_neighbors(adata, coord_type='generic', n_neighs=6) # Find spatially variable genes using Moran's I sq.gr.spatial_autocorr(adata, mode='moran', genes=adata.var_names[:1000]) # Get top spatially variable genes svg = adata.uns['moranI'].sort_values('I', ascending=False) print('Top spatially variable genes:') print(svg.head(20))
Goal: Create a unified gene set that captures both expression variability and spatial patterning.
Approach: Take the union of highly variable genes and top spatially variable genes for downstream analysis.
python# Get union of highly variable and spatially variable genes hvg = set(adata.var_names[adata.var['highly_variable']]) svg_top = set(adata.uns['moranI'].head(500).index) selected_genes = hvg | svg_top print(f'HVG: {len(hvg)}, SVG: {len(svg_top)}, Union: {len(selected_genes)}') # Subset to selected genes for downstream adata_subset = adata[:, list(selected_genes)].copy()
python# Scale for PCA (use log-normalized data) sc.pp.scale(adata, max_value=10)
python# Run PCA sc.tl.pca(adata, n_comps=50) # Variance explained sc.pl.pca_variance_ratio(adata, n_pcs=50)
Goal: Execute a full spatial preprocessing workflow from raw data to PCA-ready AnnData.
Approach: Chain QC, filtering, normalization, HVG selection, scaling, and PCA into a single pipeline.
pythonimport squidpy as sq import scanpy as sc # Load data adata = sq.read.visium('spaceranger_output/') # QC adata.var['mt'] = adata.var_names.str.startswith('MT-') sc.pp.calculate_qc_metrics(adata, qc_vars=['mt'], inplace=True) # Filter sc.pp.filter_cells(adata, min_counts=1000) sc.pp.filter_cells(adata, min_genes=500) adata = adata[adata.obs['pct_counts_mt'] < 20].copy() sc.pp.filter_genes(adata, min_cells=10) # Normalize adata.layers['counts'] = adata.X.copy() sc.pp.normalize_total(adata, target_sum=1e4) sc.pp.log1p(adata) # HVGs sc.pp.highly_variable_genes(adata, n_top_genes=2000, flavor='seurat_v3', layer='counts') # Scale and PCA sc.pp.scale(adata, max_value=10) sc.tl.pca(adata, n_comps=50) print(f'Preprocessed: {adata.n_obs} spots, {adata.n_vars} genes') adata.write_h5ad('preprocessed.h5ad')
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +18 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.