Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Design AWS serverless architectures for startups with IaC. Use when designing serverless architecture, writing CloudFormation, optimizing AWS costs, setting up CI/CD, or migrating to AWS across Lambda, API Gateway, and DynamoDB.
.claude/skills/borghei-aws-solution-architect/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -48% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 48% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -46% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -22% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 41% | 0% |
Design scalable, cost-effective AWS architectures for startups with infrastructure-as-code templates — recommend the right pattern, generate CloudFormation/CDK/Terraform, and optimize spend.
Before designing the architecture, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:
serverless_stack.py generates)Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the artifact.
These are Python classes imported from scripts/ (no CLI). See references/tool-reference.md for full parameters, methods, and examples.
| Tool | Purpose | Usage | |------|---------|-------| | architecture_designer.py | Recommend a pattern + service stack + cost estimate from requirements | from scripts.architecture_designer import ArchitectureDesigner | | serverless_stack.py | Generate CloudFormation / CDK / Terraform serverless templates | from scripts.serverless_stack import ServerlessStackGenerator | | cost_optimizer.py | Analyze inventory + spend → prioritized savings recommendations | from scripts.cost_optimizer import CostOptimizer |
Load the reference that matches the task — keep this file lean and pull detail on demand:
This skill covers:
This skill does NOT cover:
engineering/cloud-migration-specialist/ for cross-cloud strategiesengineering/senior-fullstack/ for fullstack developmentra-qm-team/ for SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, and ISO compliance skillsengineering/ms365-tenant-manager/ for tenant administration patterns| Skill | Integration | Data Flow | |-------|-------------|-----------| | engineering/senior-devops | CI/CD pipeline configuration for deploying generated IaC templates | Architecture templates flow into DevOps deployment pipelines and monitoring setup | | engineering/senior-secops | Security hardening of generated architectures (IAM policies, WAF rules, GuardDuty) | Architecture design feeds into security review; SecOps findings feed back as architecture constraints | | ra-qm-team/soc2-compliance | Compliance validation of AWS architectures against SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria | Architecture resource inventory feeds into compliance audit; audit findings drive architecture changes | | engineering/senior-backend | Backend service implementation that runs on the designed AWS infrastructure | Architecture patterns define the runtime environment; backend requirements inform service selection | | engineering/tech-stack-evaluator | Technology selection decisions that influence architecture pattern choice | Stack evaluation outputs (database, compute, messaging choices) feed into architecture requirements JSON | | c-level-advisor/cto-advisor | Strategic infrastructure decisions, build-vs-buy, and cloud budget planning | Cost analysis from cost_optimizer.py informs CTO budget decisions; CTO constraints flow back as architecture requirements |
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 24,146 | 6,005 | -75% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,848 | 2,515 | -48% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 18,222 | 18,995 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,184 | 4,713 | +48% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 22,806 | 5,413 | -76% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,429 | 2,384 | -46% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 19,812 | 8,519 | -57% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,712 | 2,892 | -22% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | 20,245 | 17,680 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,887 | 4,822 | +24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 18,514 | 6,602 | -64% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,947 | 2,476 | -16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 15,560 | 16,138 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,408 | 4,820 | +41% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 11,114 | 16,692 | +50% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,056 | 4,797 | +133% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 13,390 | 17,010 | +27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,189 | 4,518 | +106% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 10,925 | 15,030 | +38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,653 | 3,979 | +141% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 14,056 | 18,762 | +33% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,324 | 4,917 | +112% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 13,966 | 22,589 | +62% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,363 | 5,928 | +151% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 16,193 | 19,051 | +18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,214 | 5,479 | +70% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→fail | 12,984 | 15,773 | +21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,225 | 4,643 | +109% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 10,719 | 15,048 | +40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,716 | 3,896 | +127% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 17,634 | 17,470 | -1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,996 | 4,601 | +54% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 20,590 | 25,980 | +26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,590 | 7,334 | +60% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 14,008 | 13,412 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,686 | 4,136 | +54% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 14,783 | 18,040 | +22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,382 | 4,638 | +95% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 16,733 | 25,720 | +54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,696 | 5,929 | +120% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 15,660 | 15,818 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,839 | 4,489 | +58% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 12,891 | 19,404 | +51% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,051 | 4,669 | +128% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +32 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.