Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →brycewang-stanford/aaai-topic-selection
Use when deciding whether a project is a strong AAAI submission across its broad AI scope, should be reframed or routed to a dedicated track such as AI for Social Impact or AI Alignment, or should instead go to IJCAI, NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, AISTATS, UAI, ACL, CVPR, KDD, CHI, ICRA, or another specialist venue.
Passed 11 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 4 of 22 without it.
and 4 more in the full report
9 fixed3 passed either way8 still failing2 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 9 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
We created an algorithmic framework for municipal resource distribution that incorporates fairness constraints, along with an initial stakeholder study involving local public managers. We are trying to figure out if this belongs at AAAI or a domain-specific venue. Please evaluate our submission ideas and format the response with the following sections: AAAI fit, recommended track route, core AI contribution in one sentence, evidence required to support the submission, and the best venue route.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Contains the tag [Track route] AI for Social Impact | Missed | Passed |
| Identifies stakeholder analysis as required evidence for policy-sensitive claims | Passed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Use this while the project is still movable. AAAI is broad across artificial intelligence, so a strong submission should make an AI contribution that is intelligible beyond a narrow subfield.
AAAI's breadth is an asset only when the contribution reads as general AI, not a narrow benchmark result. Use the dominant signal to decide between AAAI and a specialist venue.
| Project shape | AAAI fit | Better route if not |
|---|---|---|
| New planning or KR mechanism | strong, core AAAI turf | UAI for pure uncertainty |
test cases passed, vs 4 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.