Use when targeting ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for intelligent interfaces.
SkillScore88Maintained
Automatic
◆Research pack
Last verified 9/1/2026
What it changes
Passed 21 of 24 test cases with the skill, and 13 of 24 without it.
Without skill54%
With skill88%
Checks it passed that the model alone missed
The contribution type is classified as system.
The response structures the feedback using bracketed tags.
The response outputs fit assessment using bracketed key tags.
and 7 more in the full report
8 fixed13 passed either way3 still failing0 broke
Pass-rate lift
+33 pp
Tokens
+59%
Agent turns
0%
Response time
-24%
Model gemini-3.6-flashMeasured 9/1/2026v121 of 24 cases passed with skill
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
See it in action
One of 8 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
1 of 8
Prompt
We created a mixed-initiative text editing interface where an LLM suggests sentence rewrites while predicting author intent. We evaluated system latency, acceptance rate of AI suggestions, and writing quality across 32 human participants. Assess fit for IUI.
What was checked, without and with the skill
Checked
Without skill
With skill
The response rates fit as High due to joint human-AI evaluation.
Missed
Passed
The contribution type is classified as system.
Missed
Passed
case-22 · gemini-3.6-flash · 9/1/2026 · answers are capped and redacted
What's inside
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
SKILL.md110 linessingle file
ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI)
Conference positioning
ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) is a top computer-science conference venue for AI-infused interaction, adaptive interfaces, recommender interfaces, explainable interaction, and user modeling. It rewards an intelligent-interface paper where AI behavior and user experience are jointly evaluated. Treat this skill as a fit / venue-selection / re-framing tool for conference submission strategy, not as a substitute for the current year's CFP, author kit, ethics policy, or submission portal.
Because CS conferences change deadlines, templates, page limits, review workflow, artifact rules, AI-use policy, and rebuttal formats every cycle, always verify the live official instructions before making a submission-ready recommendation. Start from the official source anchor recorded for this venue in ../../resources/conference-roster.md and ../../resources/official-source-map.md.
When to trigger
The author names IUI / ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces as the target venue.
A manuscript in AI-infused interaction needs a conference-fit read before being formatted or submitted.
The paper must be re-framed from journal style or arXiv style into a selective CS conference narrative.
The author needs an evidence-gap, anonymity, artifact, rebuttal, or re-routing diagnosis for this venue.
Scope & topic fit
Core fit: AI-infused interaction, adaptive interfaces, recommender interfaces, explainable interaction, and user modeling.
Best submissions make a precise contribution type visible: algorithm, theorem, system, dataset, benchmark, empirical finding, design artifact, tool, or socio-technical analysis.
The paper should explain why the result matters to IUI's reviewers, not just why it is interesting to the authors' lab or product context.
Position related work against the most recent conference-cycle papers in this venue and its closest siblings; stale comparisons are a common early-review weakness.
If the contribution is interdisciplinary, state which part is CS research and which part is domain evidence.
Venue-specific calibration
Reviewer lens: Treat IUI as a intelligent interfaces venue whose reviewers expect the scope and evidence to match its own community. Do not submit a generic CS paper until the introduction names the exact subcommunity, contribution type, and proof or empirical standard.
Contribution hook to foreground: the venue-specific contribution bar.
Scope vocabulary to use naturally in the abstract and introduction: AI-infused interaction, adaptive interfaces, recommender interfaces, explainable interaction, and user modeling.
Official anchor domain: iui.acm.org. Quote annual rules only after opening that source and the current-year CFP/author kit.
Close-neighbor routing guardrail
Use this profile only when the manuscript's central contribution is genuinely in intelligent
interfaces and the author can say why IUI reviewers are the primary audience, not merely a
convenient deadline.
Closest roster neighbors to compare before final routing: acm-chi-conference-on-human- factors-in-computing-systems (CHI), acm-conference-on-computer-supported-cooperative-work- and-social-computing (CSCW), acm-international-joint-conference-on-pervasive-and- ubiquitous-computing (UbiComp), `acm-international-conference-on-mobile-human-computer-
Use when targeting ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for HCI flagship.
Use when targeting ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for model-driven engineering.