Use when targeting ACM Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks (WiSec) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for wireless/mobile security.
SkillScore82Maintained
Automatic
◆Research pack
Last verified 9/1/2026
What it changes
Passed 18 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 16 of 22 without it.
Without skill73%
With skill82%
Checks it passed that the model alone missed
Formats the output using bracketed key lines.
Re-routes the paper to MobiCom, SIGCOMM, or SIGMETRICS.
Includes CFP, author kit, anonymity policy, and ethics rules under official items to re-check.
and 1 more in the full report
4 fixed14 passed either way2 still failing2 broke
Pass-rate lift
+9 pp
Tokens
+41%
Agent turns
0%
Response time
-38%
Model gemini-3.6-flashMeasured 9/1/2026v118 of 22 cases passed with skill
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
See it in action
One of 4 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
1 of 4
Prompt
I am preparing a manuscript on physical-layer spoofing attacks against industrial 5G private networks and want to assess if WiSec is the right venue. Could you analyze the paper's suitability and provide your diagnostic feedback broken down into: fit rating (High, Medium, or Low with rationale), target venue name, primary contribution category, the main evidence gap, official CFP/author checklist items to verify, the primary rejection risk, and a re-routing recommendation if another venue fits better?
What was checked, without and with the skill
Checked
Without skill
With skill
Formats the response using bracketed headers including `[Fit]`, `[Target]`, `[Contribution type]`, `[Main evidence gap]`, `[Official items to re-check]`, `[Top rejection risk]`, and `[Re-route suggestion]`.
Missed
Passed
Rates the venue fit as High given the 5G physical-layer security threat model.
Passed
Passed
case-01 · gemini-3.6-flash · 9/1/2026 · answers are capped and redacted
What's inside
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
SKILL.md105 linessingle file
ACM Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks (WiSec)
Conference positioning
ACM Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks (WiSec) is a top computer-science conference venue for wireless, mobile, IoT, sensing, RF, and network security/privacy. It rewards a wireless/mobile security paper where physical/network context is central to the threat model. Treat this skill as a fit / venue-selection / re-framing tool for conference submission strategy, not as a substitute for the current year's CFP, author kit, ethics policy, or submission portal.
Because CS conferences change deadlines, templates, page limits, review workflow, artifact rules, AI-use policy, and rebuttal formats every cycle, always verify the live official instructions before making a submission-ready recommendation. Start from the official source anchor recorded for this venue in ../../resources/conference-roster.md and ../../resources/official-source-map.md.
When to trigger
The author names WiSec / ACM Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks as the target venue.
A manuscript in wireless needs a conference-fit read before being formatted or submitted.
The paper must be re-framed from journal style or arXiv style into a selective CS conference narrative.
The author needs an evidence-gap, anonymity, artifact, rebuttal, or re-routing diagnosis for this venue.
Scope & topic fit
Core fit: wireless, mobile, IoT, sensing, RF, and network security/privacy.
Best submissions make a precise contribution type visible: algorithm, theorem, system, dataset, benchmark, empirical finding, design artifact, tool, or socio-technical analysis.
The paper should explain why the result matters to WiSec's reviewers, not just why it is interesting to the authors' lab or product context.
Position related work against the most recent conference-cycle papers in this venue and its closest siblings; stale comparisons are a common early-review weakness.
If the contribution is interdisciplinary, state which part is CS research and which part is domain evidence.
Venue-specific calibration
Reviewer lens: Treat WiSec as a wireless/mobile security venue whose reviewers expect the scope and evidence to match its own community. Do not submit a generic CS paper until the introduction names the exact subcommunity, contribution type, and proof or empirical standard.
Contribution hook to foreground: the venue-specific contribution bar.
Scope vocabulary to use naturally in the abstract and introduction: wireless, mobile, IoT, sensing, RF, and network security/privacy.
Use when targeting IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (IEEE S&P) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for security flagship.
Use when targeting ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for digital libraries.