Use when targeting ACM Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security (ASIACCS) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for security.
SkillScore92Maintained
Automatic
◆Security & AppSec pack
Last verified 9/1/2026
What it changes
Passed 23 of 25 test cases with the skill, and 16 of 25 without it.
Without skill64%
With skill92%
Checks it passed that the model alone missed
The '[Contribution type]' field is set to empirical.
The response structures the output with bracketed field tags.
The '[Fit]' field uses one of the values High, Medium, or Low.
and 8 more in the full report
7 fixed16 passed either way2 still failing0 broke
Pass-rate lift
+28 pp
Tokens
+59%
Agent turns
0%
Response time
-14%
Model gemini-3.6-flashMeasured 9/1/2026v123 of 25 cases passed with skill
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
See it in action
One of 7 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
1 of 7
Prompt
We developed a microarchitectural side-channel attack targeting cellular base stations and want to gauge its suitability for AsiaCCS. Could you assess our manuscript fit and output the evaluation using the following fields: [Fit] status and one-line reason, [Target] conference name, [Contribution type], [Main evidence gap] for missing technical/experimental proofs, [Official items to re-check] for submission guidelines, [Top rejection risk], and [Re-route suggestion] in case another security venue is more aligned?
What was checked, without and with the skill
Checked
Without skill
With skill
The output formats each entry with bracketed section tags.
Passed
Passed
The '[Contribution type]' line selects a value from the allowed vocabulary.
Missed
Passed
The assessment identifies mitigation evaluation as a technical requirement.
Missed
Passed
case-02 · gemini-3.6-flash · 9/1/2026 · answers are capped and redacted
What's inside
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
SKILL.md105 linessingle file
ACM Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security (ASIACCS)
Conference positioning
ACM Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security (ASIACCS) is a top computer-science conference venue for computer and communications security with Asia-Pacific community focus. It rewards a security paper with strong methods and international relevance in the AsiaCCS cycle. Treat this skill as a fit / venue-selection / re-framing tool for conference submission strategy, not as a substitute for the current year's CFP, author kit, ethics policy, or submission portal.
Because CS conferences change deadlines, templates, page limits, review workflow, artifact rules, AI-use policy, and rebuttal formats every cycle, always verify the live official instructions before making a submission-ready recommendation. Start from the official source anchor recorded for this venue in ../../resources/conference-roster.md and ../../resources/official-source-map.md.
When to trigger
The author names ASIACCS / ACM Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security as the target venue.
A manuscript in computer and communications security with Asia-Pacific community focus needs a conference-fit read before being formatted or submitted.
The paper must be re-framed from journal style or arXiv style into a selective CS conference narrative.
The author needs an evidence-gap, anonymity, artifact, rebuttal, or re-routing diagnosis for this venue.
Scope & topic fit
Core fit: computer and communications security with Asia-Pacific community focus.
Best submissions make a precise contribution type visible: algorithm, theorem, system, dataset, benchmark, empirical finding, design artifact, tool, or socio-technical analysis.
The paper should explain why the result matters to ASIACCS's reviewers, not just why it is interesting to the authors' lab or product context.
Position related work against the most recent conference-cycle papers in this venue and its closest siblings; stale comparisons are a common early-review weakness.
If the contribution is interdisciplinary, state which part is CS research and which part is domain evidence.
Venue-specific calibration
Reviewer lens: Treat ASIACCS as a security venue whose reviewers expect the scope and evidence to match its own community. Do not submit a generic CS paper until the introduction names the exact subcommunity, contribution type, and proof or empirical standard.
Contribution hook to foreground: the venue-specific contribution bar.
Scope vocabulary to use naturally in the abstract and introduction: computer and communications security with Asia-Pacific community focus.
Use when targeting European Symposium on Research in Computer Security (ESORICS) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for security.