Use when targeting ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for social computing.
SkillScore73Maintained
Automatic
◆Research pack
Last verified 9/2/2026
What it changes
Passed 16 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 8 of 22 without it.
Without skill36%
With skill73%
Checks it passed that the model alone missed
The diagnosis lists CHI as a roster neighbor.
The assessment rates the CSCW venue fit as Low.
The output classifies the contribution type as system.
and 9 more in the full report
9 fixed7 passed either way5 still failing1 broke
Pass-rate lift
+36 pp
Tokens
+47%
Agent turns
0%
Response time
-35%
Model gemini-3.6-flashMeasured 9/2/2026v116 of 22 cases passed with skill
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
See it in action
One of 9 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
1 of 9
Prompt
We are preparing our manuscript on peer support networks in healthcare communities for CSCW. What review submission portal should we verify in our checklist? Provide the venue assessment diagnosis in the standard key-value format.
What was checked, without and with the skill
Checked
Without skill
With skill
The response specifies Precision Conference as the submission system workflow to check.
Passed
Passed
The diagnosis assigns '[Fit] High' for peer support networks.
Missed
Passed
case-16 · gemini-3.6-flash · 9/2/2026 · answers are capped and redacted
What's inside
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
SKILL.md103 linessingle file
ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW)
Conference positioning
ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW) is a top computer-science conference venue for collaboration systems, online communities, social platforms, moderation, organizations, and cooperative work. It rewards a social-computing paper with empirical depth and design implications for cooperative systems. Treat this skill as a fit / venue-selection / re-framing tool for conference submission strategy, not as a substitute for the current year's CFP, author kit, ethics policy, or submission portal.
Because CS conferences change deadlines, templates, page limits, review workflow, artifact rules, AI-use policy, and rebuttal formats every cycle, always verify the live official instructions before making a submission-ready recommendation. Start from the official source anchor recorded for this venue in ../../resources/conference-roster.md and ../../resources/official-source-map.md.
When to trigger
The author names CSCW / ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing as the target venue.
A manuscript in collaboration systems needs a conference-fit read before being formatted or submitted.
The paper must be re-framed from journal style or arXiv style into a selective CS conference narrative.
The author needs an evidence-gap, anonymity, artifact, rebuttal, or re-routing diagnosis for this venue.
Scope & topic fit
Core fit: collaboration systems, online communities, social platforms, moderation, organizations, and cooperative work.
Best submissions make a precise contribution type visible: algorithm, theorem, system, dataset, benchmark, empirical finding, design artifact, tool, or socio-technical analysis.
The paper should explain why the result matters to CSCW's reviewers, not just why it is interesting to the authors' lab or product context.
Position related work against the most recent conference-cycle papers in this venue and its closest siblings; stale comparisons are a common early-review weakness.
If the contribution is interdisciplinary, state which part is CS research and which part is domain evidence.
Venue-specific calibration
Reviewer lens: Treat CSCW as a social computing venue whose reviewers expect the scope and evidence to match its own community. Do not submit a generic CS paper until the introduction names the exact subcommunity, contribution type, and proof or empirical standard.
Contribution hook to foreground: the venue-specific contribution bar.
Scope vocabulary to use naturally in the abstract and introduction: collaboration systems, online communities, social platforms, moderation, organizations, and cooperative work.
Official anchor domain: cscw.acm.org. Quote annual rules only after opening that source and the current-year CFP/author kit.
Close-neighbor routing guardrail
Use this profile only when the manuscript's central contribution is genuinely in social
computing and the author can say why CSCW reviewers are the primary audience, not merely a
convenient deadline.
Closest roster neighbors to compare before final routing: acm-chi-conference-on-human- factors-in-computing-systems (CHI), acm-conference-on-intelligent-user-interfaces (IUI),
acm-international-joint-conference-on-pervasive-and-ubiquitous-computing (UbiComp). Break
ties by contribution type, evidence shape, reviewer community, and the current official CFP
Use when targeting ACM SIGIR Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for interactive IR.
Use when targeting ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for intelligent interfaces.