Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →brycewang-stanford/agsy-workflow
Use as the entry point for any Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript. Routes to the right AgSy sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and which article type (research paper, short communication, perspective, comment, review) fits. AgSy is a systems-science journal, so the router's first job is to confirm there is a real systems question — interactions, hierarchical levels, trade-offs — not a single-factor field trial. It dispatches; it does not draft content.
Passed 20 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 5 of 22 without it.
and 28 more in the full report
15 fixed5 passed either way2 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 15 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
We are submitting a rapid-review opinion piece of approximately 1,900 words on integrating machine learning into crop-soil systems modeling. What is the classification? Format as: 【Stage】 【Article type】 【Systems question?】 【Route to】 【Why】 【Then】
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The response output identifies Perspective as the Article type. | Passed | Passed |
| The response output routes to agsy-writing-style. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
The orchestrator for an Agricultural Systems submission. Figure out the stage and the article type, then send the user to the matching skill. AgSy is defined by interactions across components and hierarchical levels (field → farm → landscape → region → food system) — the router's first job is to make sure the paper poses a genuine systems question, analyzed with modelling and trade-offs, not a single-factor agronomic trial.
agsy-revision-and-rebuttal)| Situation | Article type | Route to |
|---|---|---|
| Full systems study (interactions, modelling, trade-offs) | Research paper (~8,000 words) | normal pipeline below |
| One focused systems result | Short communication (~4,000 words) | normal pipeline, tighter scope |
| Forward-looking opinion on agricultural-systems science | Perspective (~2,000 words, rapid review) | agsy-writing-style + agsy-impact-and-implications |
| Short response to a published AgSy paper | Comment (~1,000 words) | agsy-literature-positioning + agsy-writing-style |
| Integrative synthesis of a systems literature | Review (consult editors first where required) | agsy-literature-positioning + agsy-systems-framing-and-modeling |
If the work is really a single-treatment field trial with no interactions, trade-offs, or model, it is off-fit — reframe it as a systems question or send it to a field-crops/agronomy journal.
Is it a real systems question? → agsy-topic-selection
Where does it sit in the field? → agsy-literature-positioning
System boundaries + the model? → agsy-systems-framing-and-modeling
Is the model evaluated soundly? → agsy-data-and-model-evaluation
Do exhibits show interactions? → agsy-figures-and-tables
Does it read clearly? → agsy-writing-style
Why does the result matter? → agsy-impact-and-implications
Data + code + models shareable? → agsy-reproducibility-and-data-policy
How will it be judged? → agsy-review-process
test cases passed, vs 5 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.