Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →brycewang-stanford/en-agrienv-journal-workflow
Use when deciding which English agriculture / environment / earth-science journal skill to invoke next, comparing fit across the 30-journal agriculture-and-environment roadmap, or routing a manuscript before venue-specific re-framing. Routes by sub-field (agronomy / plant / soil / food / environment / earth / climate), contribution type, and evidence shape (field trial / lab assay / observational survey / model / dataset).
Passed 19 of 21 test cases with the skill, and 11 of 21 without it.
and 6 more in the full report
9 fixed11 passed either way1 still failing1 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 8 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
We synthesized global marine and terrestrial reactive nitrogen fluxes to calculate revised planetary nitrogen budgets. Output the routing summary block.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Routes primary target to global-biogeochemical-cycles. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
This is the routing skill for the agriculture-and-environment bundle. It does not
replace a single-journal profile; it first classifies the manuscript by sub-field,
contribution type, and evidence shape, then routes into the matching per-journal
skill for fit and re-framing. It is a sibling to en-natsci-journal-workflow
(natural science) and en-engtech-journal-workflow (engineering).
Before naming a journal, classify the manuscript through these gates. A weak gate does not always mean "do not submit"; it usually means route down to a specialist venue, reframe the claim, or fix the evidence before testing a higher-prestige venue.
| Gate | Pass signal | If weak |
|---|---|---|
| Contribution | A mechanism, management implication, method, projection, or dataset that transfers beyond the study site | Reframe as a local case study, technical note, or specialist-field result |
| Evidence strength | Replicated sites/seasons/systems, transparent uncertainty, and controls matched to the claim | Do not route to broad Nature/society flagships; strengthen replication first |
| Scale match | Claim scale matches the evidence scale: plot, field, landscape, regional, global, or dataset | Narrow the title/abstract and select a venue that accepts the actual scale |
| Data/code readiness | Data, code, model configuration, and metadata can be deposited or shared under field norms | Treat deposition as a blocker for ESSD, earth-system, hydrology, and reuse claims |
| Compliance | Permits, ethics, biosafety, field-site permissions, and competing-interest disclosures are known | Pause final routing until the single-journal checklist can verify requirements |
test cases passed, vs 11 / 21 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.