Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →brycewang-stanford/aerj-workflow
Use as the entry point for any American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) manuscript. Routes to the right AERJ sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and whether the manuscript's field-wide education-research fit is clear. It dispatches; it does not draft content.
Passed 17 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 6 of 22 without it.
and 15 more in the full report
14 fixed3 passed either way2 still failing3 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 14 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
Our paper is currently optimizing tables, figures, and exhibit masking. What skill should we enter right now, and what skill follows directly after? Format using 【Stage】, 【Dominant lens】, 【Route to】, 【Why】, and 【Then】.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The Route to field specifies aerj-tables-figures. | Missed | Passed |
| The Then field specifies aerj-writing-style. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
The orchestrator for an AERJ submission. Figure out the stage and the manuscript's dominant education research lens, then send the user to the matching skill. AERJ is a field-wide generalist journal; the router's first job is to make sure the paper is pitched to the whole field, not to a single subfield. The old SIA/TLHD section split ended for new manuscripts in 2015.
aerj-rebuttal)| Situation | Dominant lens | Then |
|---|---|---|
| Policy, governance, equity, organizations, institutions | Policy / institutional / organizational | normal pipeline below |
| Teaching, learning, instruction, human development | Teaching / learning / development | normal pipeline below |
| Sits across lenses | name the dominant framing | explain why the contribution travels across the field |
The lens is about topic and framing, not method. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods work can all fit if the education-research contribution is broad enough.
Idea / fit / field-wide lens? → aerj-topic-selection
Where does it sit in the field? → aerj-literature-positioning
What frames the contribution? → aerj-theory-and-framework
Is the design defensible? → aerj-research-design
Are the analyses sound? → aerj-data-analysis
Are the exhibits clear? → aerj-tables-figures
Does it read for the field? → aerj-writing-style
Reporting standards & data? → aerj-transparency-and-data-policy
How will it be judged? → aerj-review-process
Ready to submit? → aerj-submission
Got an R&R / decision? → aerj-rebuttal
test cases passed, vs 6 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.