Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →brycewang-stanford/anmath-workflow
Use when deciding which anmath-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing work on a pure-mathematics manuscript from scope check through major revision for an Annals of Mathematics submission. Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.
Passed 21 of 21 test cases with the skill, and 7 of 21 without it.
and 16 more in the full report
15 fixed7 passed either way0 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 14 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
What specific metadata elements must be included inside the README.txt file within the final paper submission directory?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Requires MSC 2020 primary and secondary classifications | Missed | Passed |
| Requires arXiv identifier or prior-submission note | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
This is the router. It does not replace any specialized skill; it tells you which anmath- skill to use at your current stage* of a theorem-and-proof manuscript.
Default assumption: unless you say otherwise, the target is Annals of Mathematics, where the bar is significance + originality + a complete, correct, rigorously verified proof with clear exposition. The importance threshold is very high and acceptance is highly competitive.
| Current symptom | Next skill |
|---|---|
| Unsure the result clears the Annals importance bar / is in scope | anmath-scope-fit |
| Main theorem stated vaguely; significance/positioning unclear | anmath-results-framing |
| Proof works but the argument's architecture is not laid out | anmath-methods |
| Exposition is hard to follow; sectioning/notation/diagrams weak | anmath-figures |
| Long computations / auxiliary lemmas clutter the main line | anmath-supplementary |
| Prose is sloppy; "clearly"/"it is easy to see" hide steps | anmath-writing-style |
| Paper feels bloated or padded; every section not yet justified | anmath-length-management |
| Preparing the cover note to the editors | anmath-cover-letter |
| Ready to submit; need the final preflight | anmath-submission |
| Want to anticipate how an expert referee will probe the proof | anmath-referee-strategy |
| Received a report; need to revise and reply | anmath-revision |
anmath-scope-fit — confirm the result is important and original enough for Annalsanmath-results-framing — state the main theorem(s) precisely and position themanmath-methods — lay out the proof strategy, key lemmas, and where the difficulty liestest cases passed, vs 7 / 21 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.