Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →brycewang-stanford/arpsych-editor-strategy
Use when managing scope, length, deadlines, and the production relationship with the Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) Editor and Annual Reviews production team. Handles the editorial/production process; it does not get the initial invitation (arpsych-proposal-and-commissioning) or run the final file preflight (arpsych-submission).
Passed 20 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 9 of 22 without it.
and 15 more in the full report
12 fixed8 passed either way1 still failing1 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 12 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
We have completed all editorial prep for our Annual Review of Psychology article: assigned length is strictly tracked including figures; due date is calendared backward from production; scope boundaries with neighboring reviews are confirmed; balance plan for the intelligence debate was communicated; figure permissions are cleared early; and post-delivery review/proof time is scheduled. Provide the required editor strategy output block.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The output sets Y flags for Length, Deadline, Scope boundary, Balance signal, Permissions, and Timeline | Missed | Passed |
| The output ends with 【Next step】→ arpsych-submission (final delivery preflight) | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
ARPsych is run by its Editors (Susan T. Fiske since 2000, co-editing with Daniel L. Schacter for the 2026 volume; web-verified 2026-06-22, re-verify before relying) plus an Editorial Committee of associate editors and rotating members, supported by Annual Reviews production staff (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准). Unlike a normal journal, the editorial relationship begins at invitation and runs through commissioning, scope-setting, peer review, and production. The Editor cares about three things you can manage proactively: scope fit within the volume, balance/accuracy (see arpsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance), and hitting length and deadline.
| Lever | How to manage it |
|---|---|
| Assigned length | It is in the invitation and includes figures/tables; keep to it. If the topic truly needs more, negotiate early, not at delivery (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准) |
| Due date | Annual volumes are scheduled; a late review can slip a whole year. Calendar backward from the production deadline |
| Scope boundary | Confirm with the Editor what neighboring commissioned reviews cover, to avoid overlap or gaps |
| Balance concerns | If the topic is contested, signal early how you will cover rival camps even-handedly |
| Figures/permissions | Flag any reproduced exhibits needing permission well before the deadline |
After delivery, the Annual Reviews process runs: Committee/peer review for accuracy, rigor, and balance → revision → copyediting to house style → proofs → publication in the annual volume (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准). Implications:
test cases passed, vs 9 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.