Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →brycewang-stanford/causal-ml
This skill covers causal machine learning methods in applied economics and quantitative social science.
Passed 20 of 23 test cases with the skill, and 16 of 23 without it.
and 2 more in the full report
4 fixed16 passed either way3 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 4 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
I trained an ensemble method for CATE estimation on my customer dataset and extracted individual predicted effects. I ran a Best Linear Predictor calibration test on the predictions, obtaining a p-value of 0.22. My colleague wants to publish the subgroup heterogeneity table immediately. What should I advise?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Advises against reporting heterogeneous treatment effects as statistically meaningful. | Passed | Passed |
| Explains that the calibration test p-value exceeds the 0.10 significance threshold. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Reference for semiparametric ML estimators: DML with cross-fitting, generalized random forests, debiased regularization, and nuisance function approximation. Covers Neyman-orthogonal moment conditions, sample splitting, plug-in bias correction, and heterogeneous treatment effects.
Use when the user is:
econml, DoubleML, or grf packagesSkip when:
causal-inference skill)structural-modeling skill)identification-proofs skill)references/dml.mdreferences/grf-meta-learners.mdreferences/high-dim-cross-fitting.mdreferences/hte-inference.mdreferences/connections-traditional.md| Dimension | Traditional (IV, DiD, RDD) | Causal ML |
|---|---|---|
| Functional form | Parametric | Nonparametric / semi-parametric |
| High-dimensional controls | Problematic | Native support |
| Heterogeneous effects | Secondary (subgroup analysis) | Primary estimand (CATE) |
| Sample requirements | Moderate N | ML nuisance needs large N |
| Identification | Explicit (IV, DiD, RCT) | Same assumptions — ML is estimation, not identification |
test cases passed, vs 16 / 23 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.