Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →brycewang-stanford/chi-supplementary
Use when assembling supplementary materials for an ACM CHI submission — the video figure with mandatory closed captions, appendices, study instruments, code and data archives — all due with the paper on the single September deadline, anonymized end to end, plus the camera-ready video preview.
Passed 24 of 24 test cases with the skill, and 20 of 24 without it.
and 1 more in the full report
4 fixed20 passed either way0 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 4 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
We are preparing a multi-folder zip file containing raw data, analysis scripts, and survey instruments. What essential file should sit at the root of this code and data archive to orient the reviewer?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Recommends placing a README file at the root mapping archive contents to corresponding paper sections | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
CHI collects the paper, the video figure, and every supplementary file together on the one submission deadline (September 10, 2026 for CHI 2027, per chi2027.acm.org, read 2026-07-08). There is no later supplement slot, so supplement production is deadline-week work that must be scheduled like writing. Everything uploaded is part of the anonymous review record; everything accepted ships to the ACM Digital Library beside the paper, permanently.
| Material | Phase | Governing rule |
|---|---|---|
| Video figure (≤ ~5 min, illustrates the work) | With submission | Anonymized; closed captions required |
| Appendices (instruments, extra tables, prompts) | With submission | Reviewed at reviewer discretion; paper must stand alone |
| Code / data archive | With submission | De-identified, anonymous, no .git history |
| Consent/IRB templates | With submission | Templated versions only — these files name institutions by design |
| Video preview (~30 s pitch) | Camera-ready (publication-ready deadline) | Accepted papers only; captioned; goes to DL and program |
| Final supplements | Publication-ready deadline | De-anonymized, captioned, archival quality |
The self-containment rule cuts across all of it: reviewers must be able to judge the contribution from the PDF alone. Supplements deepen; they never carry a load-bearing result.
SIGCHI's video guide (sigchi.org/resources/guides-for-authors/videos/) sets the expectations this pack verifies: video figures illustrate key aspects of the work, run up to about five minutes, are archived in the DL, and every video needs a closed-caption file (SRT, SBV, or VTT). Craft rules that survive review:
test cases passed, vs 20 / 24 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.