Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →brycewang-stanford/acmmm-supplementary
Use when organizing the ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) supplementary material due after the paper deadline — deciding what belongs in the 6-8 page body versus the supplement, packaging video/audio/interactive demos that render on a reviewer's machine, keeping all assets anonymous for double-blind tracks, and pointing to code and data.
Passed 20 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 15 of 22 without it.
and 3 more in the full report
6 fixed14 passed either way1 still failing1 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 6 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
Our team is submitting a computer vision paper to IEEE CVPR. We want to know if CVPR allows supplementary materials to be submitted a week after the main paper deadline like ACM MM does, and whether CVPR requires supplementary PDFs to follow the ACM sigconf template.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The response explains that IEEE CVPR follows its own conference submission schedule rather than ACM Multimedia post-paper timing. | Missed | Passed |
| The response states that CVPR supplementary PDFs must adhere to the IEEE CVPR template. | Passed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Use this to plan the ACM Multimedia supplement, which has its own deadline after the paper (in 2026, April 8 versus the April 1 paper deadline). For a multimedia paper the supplement is not an afterthought — it is where the video, audio, and interactive evidence lives.
The 6–8 page sigconf body carries the argument; the supplement carries what the argument rests on but cannot fit.
| Content | Body | Supplement |
|---|---|---|
| Core claim, main results table, teaser | Yes | — |
| The two or three decisive media examples | Yes (stills/short) | Full clips |
| Extra qualitative media across conditions | — | Yes |
| Full user-study protocol and per-rater data | Summary only | Yes |
| Hyperparameters, extra ablations, proofs | Pointer only | Yes |
| Code / data pointers | Named | Yes |
A reviewer must be able to follow the body without the supplement; the supplement then confirms rather than completes the argument.
The single most common ACM MM supplement failure is media a reviewer cannot open.
video: H.264/MP4, standard resolution, plays in a browser/VLC; no exotic codec
audio: WAV or MP3; label each clip with the claim it supports
demo: if interactive, provide a recorded fallback video — do not assume the reviewer runs it
size: keep within the cycle's stated limit; compress rather than omit evidence
index: a short README mapping each file to the paper claim/figure it supports
test cases passed, vs 15 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.