Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Ready-to-use agent skills for scientific research and engineering
.claude/skills/brycewang-stanford-claude-scientific-guide/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 70% | 0% |
| case-23 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | -3% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 14% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 93% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 44% | 0% |
A comprehensive skill that provides ready-to-use agent instructions for conducting scientific research, designing experiments, and solving engineering problems. Based on the claude-scientific-skills repository (14K stars), this skill distills best practices for leveraging Claude as a research methodology assistant across disciplines.
Scientific research demands rigorous methodology: forming hypotheses, designing experiments, analyzing results, and iterating on findings. This skill equips the agent with structured approaches to each phase of the scientific process, drawing from proven prompt patterns that have been validated across thousands of research workflows.
The skill covers three primary domains: fundamental research methodology, applied science workflows, and engineering problem-solving. Each domain includes step-by-step procedures, quality checkpoints, and common pitfalls to avoid.
When assisting with research methodology, follow these structured approaches:
Hypothesis Formation
Experiment Design
Data Collection Planning
The agent should apply these analysis patterns when helping researchers:
Exploratory Analysis
Reproducibility Checklist
Literature Synthesis
For engineering-oriented research tasks, the agent follows structured problem-solving:
Problem Definition
Solution Development
Validation and Iteration
This skill integrates with the Research-Claw agent to provide methodology assistance during active research sessions. When activated, the agent can:
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-23 | pass→pass | 19,324 | 16,429 | -15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,235 | 3,154 | -3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | 11,179 | 7,798 | -30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,757 | 2,105 | +20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 47,498 | 30,008 | -37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,051 | 4,569 | -10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | pass→pass | 21,471 | 19,307 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,704 | 4,209 | +14% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | pass→pass | 12,025 | 15,439 | +28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,643 | 3,168 | +93% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 11,289 | 11,870 | +5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,811 | 2,603 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 18,216 | 19,762 | +8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,886 | 4,057 | +41% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | 13,741 | 20,304 | +48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,528 | 3,943 | +56% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 14,953 | 13,485 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,349 | 3,320 | +41% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 17,982 | 13,382 | -26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,078 | 3,197 | +4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 9,327 | 10,628 | +14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,659 | 2,708 | +63% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 8,737 | 9,860 | +13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,438 | 2,504 | +74% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 11,964 | 10,834 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,879 | 2,701 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 16,729 | 17,545 | +5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,774 | 3,686 | +33% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 15,925 | 14,715 | -8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,256 | 3,146 | +39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 16,570 | 15,965 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,380 | 3,538 | +49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 12,776 | 15,739 | +23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,991 | 3,270 | +64% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | 15,966 | 17,600 | +10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,450 | 3,765 | +54% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 11,583 | 12,900 | +11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,811 | 3,041 | +68% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 8,730 | 7,367 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,310 | 2,233 | +70% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | 11,708 | 11,639 | -1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,855 | 2,661 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 18,480 | 22,535 | +22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,775 | 4,019 | +45% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 15,168 | 19,607 | +29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,414 | 3,536 | +46% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +4 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.