Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Survey and paper collection on LLMs for code generation
.claude/skills/brycewang-stanford-code-llm-papers-guide/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 106% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 22% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 55% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -21% | 0% |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 13% | 0% |
This curated collection covers LLMs for code — from foundational models (Codex, CodeGen, StarCoder) through code generation, completion, repair, translation, and understanding. Accompanies a TMLR survey paper providing systematic categorization. Tracks 500+ papers across pre-training, fine-tuning, evaluation, and application of code-focused language models.
Code LLMs
├── Pre-training
│ ├── Encoder-only (CodeBERT, GraphCodeBERT)
│ ├── Decoder-only (Codex, CodeGen, StarCoder, DeepSeek-Coder)
│ └── Encoder-Decoder (CodeT5, PLBART)
├── Fine-tuning & Alignment
│ ├── Instruction tuning (WizardCoder, Magicoder)
│ ├── RLHF for code (CodeRL)
│ └── Self-play (AlphaCode)
├── Applications
│ ├── Code generation (NL → Code)
│ ├── Code completion (infilling)
│ ├── Code repair (bug fixing)
│ ├── Code translation (language conversion)
│ ├── Code summarization (Code → NL)
│ ├── Test generation
│ └── Code review
└── Evaluation
├── Benchmarks (HumanEval, MBPP, SWE-bench)
├── Metrics (pass@k, CodeBLEU)
└── Security analysis| Model | Year | Organization | Parameters | Key Innovation | |-------|------|-------------|------------|----------------| | CodeBERT | 2020 | Microsoft | 125M | Bimodal NL-PL pre-training | | Codex | 2021 | OpenAI | 12B | GPT-3 fine-tuned on GitHub | | AlphaCode | 2022 | DeepMind | 41B | Competitive programming | | StarCoder | 2023 | BigCode | 15B | Fill-in-the-middle, 1T tokens | | CodeLlama | 2023 | Meta | 34B | Llama 2 + code specialization | | DeepSeek-Coder | 2024 | DeepSeek | 33B | 2T token project-level training | | Qwen2.5-Coder | 2024 | Alibaba | 32B | 5.5T tokens, multi-language |
python# Track model performance on HumanEval humaneval_scores = { "GPT-4": {"pass_at_1": 67.0, "pass_at_10": 86.0}, "Claude 3.5 Sonnet": {"pass_at_1": 64.0}, "DeepSeek-Coder-33B": {"pass_at_1": 56.1}, "CodeLlama-34B": {"pass_at_1": 48.8}, "StarCoder2-15B": {"pass_at_1": 46.3}, "GPT-3.5-Turbo": {"pass_at_1": 48.1}, } print(f"{'Model':<25} {'pass@1':>8} {'pass@10':>8}") print("-" * 43) for model, scores in sorted( humaneval_scores.items(), key=lambda x: x[1].get("pass_at_1", 0), reverse=True, ): p1 = scores.get("pass_at_1", "—") p10 = scores.get("pass_at_10", "—") print(f"{model:<25} {str(p1):>8} {str(p10):>8}")
markdown### Active Areas (2024-2025) 1. **Repository-level generation** — Understanding full codebases 2. **Agentic coding** — LLMs using tools (debugger, terminal) 3. **Formal verification** — Proving correctness of generated code 4. **Multi-language** — Cross-language transfer and translation 5. **Security** — Detecting and avoiding vulnerable code 6. **Long context** — Processing large codebases (100k+ tokens) 7. **Code editing** — Natural language instructions for code changes
pythonimport arxiv def find_code_llm_papers(topic="code generation", max_results=20): """Find recent Code LLM papers on arXiv.""" query = f"abs:{topic} AND (abs:large language model OR abs:LLM)" search = arxiv.Search( query=query, max_results=max_results, sort_by=arxiv.SortCriterion.SubmittedDate, ) for result in search.results(): print(f"[{result.published.strftime('%Y-%m-%d')}] " f"{result.title}") find_code_llm_papers("code generation") find_code_llm_papers("automated program repair")
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 25,827 | 57,465 | +122% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,956 | 8,132 | +106% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 22,327 | 17,256 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,796 | 4,623 | +22% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 16,759 | 14,146 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,648 | 3,675 | +39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 17,516 | 14,988 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,875 | 3,938 | +37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | 17,842 | 15,282 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,760 | 3,719 | +35% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 18,472 | 20,395 | +10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,020 | 4,542 | +50% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 14,441 | 11,355 | -21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,274 | 3,530 | +55% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | 19,170 | 16,039 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,488 | 4,290 | +23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | 15,062 | 10,432 | -31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,551 | 3,243 | +27% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 14,526 | 3,400 | -77% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,582 | 2,037 | -21% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 15,512 | 14,368 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,292 | 3,799 | +66% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 5,775 | 2,487 | -57% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,031 | 1,855 | +80% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 18,529 | 16,735 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,837 | 4,171 | +47% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 19,469 | 13,056 | -33% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,940 | 3,331 | +13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 20,317 | 19,608 | -3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,102 | 4,273 | +38% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 15,380 | 15,250 | -1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,766 | 4,447 | +61% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 17,239 | 5,258 | -69% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,874 | 2,313 | -20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 10,806 | 4,100 | -62% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,843 | 2,073 | +12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 19,935 | 15,526 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,766 | 3,694 | +34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 5,288 | 2,960 | -44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 863 | 1,714 | +99% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 18,177 | 20,821 | +15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,047 | 4,890 | +60% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 29,361 | 24,685 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,709 | 6,172 | +8% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +32 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.