Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →brycewang-stanford/commres-workflow
Use as the entry point for any Communication Research (CR) manuscript. Routes to the right CR sub-skill based on lifecycle stage and study type (experiment, survey/panel, or content analysis). It dispatches; it does not draft content.
Passed 20 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 3 of 22 without it.
and 24 more in the full report
17 fixed3 passed either way2 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 17 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
Our quantitative content analysis data has been analyzed, and we are now designing visual charts and summary tables to clearly present our intercoder reliability coefficients and variable distributions. Output our workflow location using bracketed Stage, Study type, Route to, Why, and Then.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Routes the project to commres-tables-figures | Missed | Passed |
| Identifies writing style as the skill step following tables and figures | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
The orchestrator for a Communication Research (CR) submission. CR is SAGE's quantitative, social-scientific communication journal — predominantly hypothesis-testing experiments and surveys with rigorous measurement and explicit theory. The router's first job is to confirm the paper is theory-driven and quantitatively identified, then send the user to the matching skill.
commres-rebuttal)| Situation | Read | Route to |
|---|---|---|
| Hypothesis-driven experiment or survey, measured constructs | core CR fit | normal pipeline below |
| Computational/text-as-data with hypothesis tests on communication processes | in scope if theory-led | pipeline; emphasize measurement validation |
| Mostly qualitative / interpretive / critical | likely off-fit | re-route to Journal of Communication / New Media & Society before polishing |
| Method/measurement paper for its own sake | off-fit | Communication Methods and Measures |
CR is not multi-paradigm. If the contribution is interpretive or a platform description, the generalist or digital-media siblings fit better — decide this before investing in the pipeline.
Idea / fit? → commres-topic-selection
Where does it sit in the field? → commres-literature-positioning
What are the hypotheses & mechanism? → commres-theory-building
Is the design causally defensible? → commres-research-design
Are the analyses sound? → commres-data-analysis
Are the exhibits clear? → commres-tables-figures
Does it read as social science? → commres-writing-style
Data, code & open practices? → commres-transparency-and-data
How will it be judged? → commres-review-process
Ready to submit? → commres-submission
Got an R&R / decision? → commres-rebuttal
test cases passed, vs 3 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.