Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →brycewang-stanford/cre-heterogeneity
Use when designing or writing heterogeneity analysis for a 《中国农村经济》 manuscript. Enforces rural-relevant cut dimensions and theoretical-justification discipline.
Passed 18 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 13 of 22 without it.
and 9 more in the full report
8 fixed10 passed either way1 still failing3 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 8 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
在给作者作出最终的“投稿就绪(submission ready)”判断之前,审核流程强制要求执行什么核验动作?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Mandates opening resources/official-source-map.md before making a final readiness declaration. | Missed | Passed |
| Requires listing at least one unverified fact that could alter the editorial recommendation. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
按《中国农村经济》读者期待度排序:
至少切 3 个维度,每个维度至少 2 个子样本对比。避免只切"东中西"——这是审稿人最容易吐槽的"偷懒维度"。
本文进一步检验[维度,落到农户 / 区域 / 村庄]异质性。
理论上,[原因——为什么这类农户 / 地区效应不同]……
实证上,本文将样本按[维度]分为[组 1] 和 [组 2],分别估计主回归(结果见表 X 第 (1)(2) 列)。
结果显示,[组 1] 的处理效应为 X,而 [组 2] 为 Y,系数差异在 [显著水平] 上显著。
这一发现与本文的[机制]一致,说明该政策 / 行为对[何种农户]的作用更强。
异质性 ≈ 机制的反向验证:
test cases passed, vs 13 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.