Use when targeting 《管理评论》(Management Review — 中国科学院大学主办的管理学术月刊, 全程匿名审稿) or deciding whether a Chinese management manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, abstract/keyword/citation house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
SkillScore95Maintained
Automatic
◆Writing & Editing pack
Last verified 9/1/2026
What it changes
Passed 21 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 12 of 22 without it.
Without skill55%
With skill95%
Checks it passed that the model alone missed
The response includes the block key 【最大风险】.
The response includes the block key 【改投建议】.
The response includes the exact line block header 【匹配度】.
and 13 more in the full report
9 fixed12 passed either way1 still failing0 broke
Pass-rate lift
+41 pp
Tokens
+43%
Agent turns
0%
Response time
-10%
Model gemini-3.6-flashMeasured 9/1/2026v121 of 22 cases passed with skill
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
See it in action
One of 9 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
Use when targeting 《南开管理评论》(Nankai Business Review) — a top Chinese business-school journal for strategy, organizational behavior, HRM, marketing, and corporate governance. Apply when a paper builds management theory grounded in the China context, uses survey/SEM or multi-case methods, and needs theoretical contribution framed for an OB/strategy audience rather than econometric policy evaluation.