Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →brycewang-stanford/response-to-reviewers
Write effective point-by-point responses to peer reviewer comments for revisions
Passed 17 of 23 test cases with the skill, and 15 of 23 without it.
and 1 more in the full report
4 fixed13 passed either way4 still failing2 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 4 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
I am preparing the resubmission package for my manuscript 'Ecology of Coastal Wetlands' (ID: EC-2023-04) to the Journal of Applied Ecology. I need a formal revision cover letter addressed to Dr. Aris Thorne that lists our three primary updates—adding a sensitivity analysis, revising the discussion on microclimates, and expanding figure captions—along with a structured point-by-point response outline for the reviewer feedback.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| States in the cover letter that changes are highlighted in blue. | Missed | Passed |
| Includes an opening letter with a numbered list of major changes preceding reviewer comments. | Passed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
A skill for crafting professional, thorough responses to peer reviewer comments during manuscript revision. Covers structure, tone, strategies for handling difficult comments, and templates for common revision scenarios.
Dear Editor,
Thank you for the opportunity to revise our manuscript entitled "[Title]"
(Manuscript ID: [ID]). We appreciate the constructive feedback from the
reviewers and have carefully addressed all comments. Below, we provide
a point-by-point response to each comment.
Major changes include:
1. [Summary of major change 1]
2. [Summary of major change 2]
3. [Summary of major change 3]
All changes in the revised manuscript are highlighted in blue.
---
REVIEWER 1
Comment 1.1: [Quote or paraphrase the reviewer's comment]
Response: [Your response]
[Reference to specific changes: "We have revised Section 3.2,
paragraph 2 (lines 145-158) to address this concern."]
Comment 1.2: ...
---
REVIEWER 2
Comment 2.1: ...
test cases passed, vs 15 / 23 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.