Review

Review

Unified review command that routes to the appropriate critic agents based on the target and flags.

Input: $ARGUMENTS — file path and/or flags.

Routing Logic

Auto-detect by file type

• .tex paper file → Comprehensive review (writer-critic + strategist-critic + Verifier)
• .R, .py, .do, .jl file → Code review (coder-critic standalone, categories 4-12)
• .tex talk file (in talks/) → Talk review (storyteller-critic)

Explicit flags (override auto-detect)

• --peer [journal] → Full peer review (editor desk review → referee dispatch → editorial decision)
• --peer --r2 [journal] → R&R second round (same referees, same dispositions, memory of prior review)
• --stress [journal] → Hostile stress test (same flow, adversarial referee dispositions)
• --methods → Causal audit (strategist-critic standalone, 4-phase review)
• --proofread → Manuscript polish (writer-critic standalone, 6 categories)
• --code [file] → Code review (coder-critic standalone, categories 4-12)
• --replicate [language] → Cross-language replication (Coder re-implements in target language + coder-critic + comparison)
• --all or no file → Paper excellence (all critics in parallel + weighted score)

Mode Details

Comprehensive Review (default for .tex paper)

Dispatch in parallel:

1. strategist-critic — causal design audit (4 phases)
2. writer-critic — manuscript polish (6 categories)
3. Verifier — compilation check Compute weighted aggregate score.

Full Peer Review (--peer [journal])

Simulates a realistic journal submission. Three phases, orchestrated sequentially.