Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes.
SkillScore59Maintained
Automatic
◆Research pack
Last verified 8/7/2026
What it changes
Passed 13 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 4 of 22 without it.
Without skill18%
With skill59%
Checks it passed that the model alone missed
Enforces a maximum limit of 5 dialogue rounds.
Activates only field_analyst, eic, and editorial_synthesizer agents.
Excludes individual peer reviewers from running Phase 1 during re-review.
and 7 more in the full report
9 fixed4 passed either way9 still failing0 broke
Pass-rate lift
+41 pp
Tokens
+284%
Agent turns
0%
Response time
-4%
Model gemini-3.6-flashMeasured 8/7/2026v113 of 22 cases passed with skill
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
See it in action
One of 9 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
1 of 9
Prompt
In re-review mode, if the decision remains Major Revision and residual coaching activates, what is the maximum number of dialogue rounds permitted before concluding?
What was checked, without and with the skill
Checked
Without skill
With skill
Enforces a maximum limit of 5 dialogue rounds.
Missed
Passed
case-18 · gemini-3.6-flash · 8/7/2026 · answers are capped and redacted
What's inside
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
SKILL.md478 lines9 files
Academic Paper Reviewer v1.4 — Multi-Perspective Academic Paper Review Agent Team
Simulates a complete international journal peer review process: automatically identifies the paper's field, dynamically configures 5 reviewers (Editor-in-Chief + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) who review from four non-overlapping perspectives — methodology, domain expertise, cross-disciplinary viewpoints, and core argument challenges — ultimately producing a structured Editorial Decision and Revision Roadmap.
v1.1 Improvements:
Added Devil's Advocate Reviewer — specifically challenges core arguments, detects logical fallacies, and identifies the strongest counter-arguments
Added re-review mode — verification review, focused on checking whether revisions address the review comments
Expanded review team from 4 to 5 members
Quick Start
Simplest command:
Review this paper: [paste paper or provide file]
Review this paper: [paste paper or provide file]
Output:
Automatically identifies the paper's field and methodology type
Dynamically configures the specific identities and expertise of 5 reviewers
5 independent review reports (each from a different perspective)