Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →hezaohezao/academic-paper-review
Structured peer-review of academic papers.
Passed 8 of 14 test cases with the skill, and 5 of 14 without it.
and 7 more in the full report
6 fixed7 passed either way8 still failing2 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 6 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
I have a list of five key references for my manuscript on federated learning privacy. Please convert these full paper citations into a clean, properly formatted BibTeX file (.bib) with standard entry keys and field formatting.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The response outputs BibTeX entry blocks for the citations. | Missed | Passed |
| The response does not generate a peer review critique. | Passed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Produces structured, peer-review-quality analyses of academic papers. Follows review standards used by top-tier venues (NeurIPS, ICML, ACL, Nature, IEEE) to provide rigorous, constructive, and balanced assessments.
Covers summary, strengths, weaknesses, methodology assessment, contribution evaluation, literature positioning, and actionable recommendations — all grounded in evidence from the paper itself.
Extract: Title, Authors, Venue/Status, Year, Domain, Paper Type (Empirical / Theoretical / Survey / Systems / Position).
Read the paper systematically using browse_page:
test cases passed, vs 5 / 14 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.