Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →brycewang-stanford/paper-critique-framework
Structured framework for writing peer review reports and paper critiques
Passed 21 of 23 test cases with the skill, and 19 of 23 without it.
3 fixed18 passed either way1 still failing1 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 3 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
I am starting my first pass review of a computer vision manuscript submitted to an AI conference. Should I read the full manuscript cover-to-cover during this initial pass, or focus on selected parts?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Recommends restricting Pass 1 reading to structural elements including title, abstract, section headings, and conclusion. | Missed | Passed |
| Identifies determining contribution type as a primary goal of Pass 1. | Passed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Writing constructive peer reviews is a core academic skill. This framework provides a systematic approach to evaluating manuscripts — from initial read-through to the final referee report. It covers what reviewers should assess, how to structure feedback, and how to calibrate between different review outcomes (accept, revise, reject). Applicable to conference papers, journal articles, and internal lab reviews.
Read only these elements:
After Pass 1, answer:
□ What is the main claim?
□ What type of contribution? (empirical, theoretical, system, survey)
□ Is it within the venue's scope?
□ Does the abstract accurately represent the content?
□ Initial impression: novel or incremental?
Read the full paper. Annotate as you go:
Annotation symbols:
? = I don't understand this
! = This is interesting / strong point
X = I disagree / see a problem
→ = This needs more evidence or justification
≈ = This is similar to [existing work] — check novelty
Focus on:
test cases passed, vs 19 / 23 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.