Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Collects and synthesizes open-source intelligence (OSINT) about threat actors, malicious infrastructure, and attack campaigns using publicly available data sources, passive reconnaissance tools, and dark web monitoring. Use when investigating external threat actor infrastructure, performing pre-engagement reconnaissance for authorized red team assessments, or enriching CTI reports with publicly available adversary context. Activates for requests involving Maltego, Shodan, OSINT framework, SpiderFoot, or infrastructure reconnaissance.
.claude/skills/collecting-open-source-intelligence/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Use this skill when:
Do not use this skill for active scanning against targets without explicit written authorization — OSINT collection must remain passive (no packets sent to target systems) unless scope permits active recon.
Establish the intelligence requirement (IR) before collecting. Document:
bash# Passive DNS via SecurityTrails API curl "https://api.securitytrails.com/v1/domain/evil-domain.com/dns/a" \ -H "apikey: YOUR_KEY" # WHOIS history via ARIN / RIPE whois -h whois.arin.net evil-domain.com # Certificate transparency logs (no API key required) curl "https://crt.sh/?q=%.evil-domain.com&output=json" | jq '.[].name_value'
Certificate transparency logs reveal all subdomains for a target domain, often exposing staging, VPN, or internal infrastructure inadvertently made public.
pythonimport shodan api = shodan.Shodan("YOUR_SHODAN_API_KEY") # Search for specific C2 framework signatures (Cobalt Strike beacon) results = api.search('product:"Cobalt Strike" port:443') for r in results['matches']: print(r['ip_str'], r['port'], r['org'], r.get('ssl', {}).get('cert', {}).get('subject', '')) # Find infrastructure associated with a known threat actor's ASN results = api.search('asn:AS12345 http.title:"Redirector"')
Correlate Shodan results with passive DNS to build infrastructure clusters.
In Maltego, use these built-in transforms for threat actor infrastructure mapping:
Maltego Maltego Cyber threat intelligence transforms (VirusTotal, Shodan, PassiveTotal, URLScan) extend graph coverage.
Use SpiderFoot HX or manual searches for:
bash# SpiderFoot CLI for automated OSINT python sf.py -s evil-domain.com -m sfp_shodan,sfp_virustotal,sfp_passivetotal \ -o TF -R result.json
| Term | Definition | |------|-----------| | Passive OSINT | Intelligence collection that does not send any packets to target systems — uses public databases, search engines, cached data | | PIR | Priority Intelligence Requirement — specific question the intelligence collection must answer, preventing unfocused data gathering | | Certificate Transparency | Public log of all SSL/TLS certificates issued by CAs, enabling discovery of subdomains via crt.sh | | Pivoting | Using one data point (IP, email, registrant name) to discover related infrastructure or accounts | | ASN | Autonomous System Number — block of IP addresses under a single routing policy; useful for clustering threat actor infrastructure | | Co-hosted Domains | Multiple domains resolving to the same IP, potentially indicating shared attacker infrastructure |
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +36 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.