Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) gathering is the first active phase of a red team engagement, where operators collect publicly available information about the target organization to identify attack s
.claude/skills/performing-open-source-intelligence-gathering/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-12 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
| case-05 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
| case-16 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
> Legal Notice: This skill is for authorized security testing and educational purposes only. Unauthorized use against systems you do not own or have written permission to test is illegal and may violate computer fraud laws.
Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) gathering is the first active phase of a red team engagement, where operators collect publicly available information about the target organization to identify attack surfaces, potential targets for social engineering, technology stacks, and credential exposures. Effective OSINT directly shapes initial access strategies and reduces operational risk.
| Category | Sources | Value | |----------|---------|-------| | Domain Intelligence | DNS records, WHOIS, CT logs, subdomain enumeration | Network attack surface | | Personnel Intelligence | LinkedIn, social media, conference talks, publications | Social engineering targets | | Credential Intelligence | Breach databases, paste sites, GitHub leaks | Valid credential discovery | | Technology Intelligence | Job postings, Wappalyzer, Shodan, Censys | Vulnerability identification | | Physical Intelligence | Google Maps, social media photos, Glassdoor | Physical access planning | | Document Intelligence | SEC filings, public documents, metadata extraction | Organizational structure |
| Tool | Purpose | Type | |------|---------|------| | Amass | Subdomain enumeration and network mapping | Open Source | | Subfinder | Passive subdomain discovery | Open Source | | theHarvester | Email, subdomain, and name harvesting | Open Source | | Maltego | Visual link analysis and data correlation | Commercial | | SpiderFoot | Automated OSINT collection | Open Source | | Shodan | Internet-connected device search | Commercial | | Censys | Internet asset discovery | Commercial | | Recon-ng | Web reconnaissance framework | Open Source | | GitDorker | GitHub secret scanning | Open Source | | Photon | Web crawler for OSINT | Open Source |
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-25 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-24 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-23 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 25 cases were attempted. The headline lift of 0 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 25 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.