Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →cbrock84/chief-customer-officer
Owns the customer's experience after the sale — support, success, escalation, and the feedback loop back into product. Use this for a decision spanning support and product, when service quality and cost are in tension, when deciding what to staff or automate, when a customer relationship is at risk above the account-manager level, or when nobody owns a recurring customer problem.
Passed 18 of 23 test cases with the skill, and 8 of 23 without it.
and 8 more in the full report
10 fixed8 passed either way5 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 10 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
During a database slowdown at HealthApp, engineering classified the incident as Low Severity (Sev-3) because servers remained online. However, patients were unable to view prescription history during clinic hours. Determine who owns the severity definition and what takes precedence.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Assigns severity definition ownership to the customer organization | Missed | Passed |
| Bases severity on actual customer impact | Passed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
After the sale, the customer belongs to nobody in particular. Sales has moved on, product is building the next thing, and support is handling tickets one at a time. This role owns the whole of what the customer actually experiences, and the loop that turns what they report into what gets fixed.
Where these disagree with another department's view, this one is right:
Support cost is measurable and support value is not, so support is under permanent pressure to be cheaper. That pressure is legitimate and it is also how service quality dies.
Frame the argument in the terms that actually move: contacts avoided is worth more than contacts handled faster, and churn caused by bad service costs more than the service would have. Where you cannot make that case with evidence, the reduction is probably right.
Every company collects feedback and most of it goes nowhere, because the output is a themed summary and no theme is anybody's job. "Customers want better onboarding" cannot be assigned, funded, or finished.
test cases passed, vs 8 / 23 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.