Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Use when writing the outbound reply a support agent sends back to a customer — structures it into a specific-issue acknowledgement, a direct resolution, a concrete next step with a timeframe, and a brief professional close, instead of a generic empathetic blob that buries or omits the next step. Do NOT use for picking a canned macro, routing a ticket to a queue, or summarizing a conversation for a human handoff.
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 384% | 0% |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 298% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 417% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 323% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 256% | 0% |
A widely-taught convention for the message a support agent sends back to a customer. Base models default to a warm but shapeless paragraph — empathy up front, the actual answer and the next action buried mid-paragraph or dropped entirely. This structure front-loads what the customer needs and always ends with a concrete next step tied to a timeframe.
Write every customer reply in these four moves, in this order.
The first sentence names the exact problem the customer raised, in their terms — the order that didn't arrive, the charge they didn't expect, the feature that errored.
Tuesday", "charged twice") so it reads as a reply to them, not a form letter.
reaching out!", "I'm sorry to hear you're having trouble." A generic opener with no specific detail is the exact default this structure replaces. Empathy is fine, but it rides with the specific acknowledgement, not instead of it.
Say what is true now — what you did, what you found, or the direct answer to their question — in plain terms, early, before any explanation.
"This was a bug on our side and it's now fixed"), then the short why if it helps.
Tell the customer exactly what happens next and when — a timeframe, a date, or a clear expectation. This is the move base models most often drop.
replacement ships today and arrives by Friday", "try logging in now — it should work immediately".
this for the product team; I'll email you the moment there's an update") — an honest expectation, never a made-up date.
One short line to end — an offer to help further or a plain sign-off. Keep it to a sentence; don't reopen the issue or pad with filler.
Every commitment in the reply must be backed by the facts you were given. Don't invent a delivery date, promise a fix timeline you don't have, or imply a resolution that hasn't happened. When the facts don't include a firm time, commit only to the follow-up you control (step 3). Confidence the facts don't support erodes trust the moment it slips.
A customer writes that a discount code failed at checkout and they were charged full price. You've refunded the difference. A conforming reply:
> Thanks for flagging the discount code that didn't apply on your checkout yesterday — you're right that you were charged the full price. I've refunded the $12 difference back to your original card. You'll see the credit land within 5–7 business days; it'll show as a refund from us on your statement. If it hasn't appeared by then, just reply here and I'll chase it down.
Notice: the opener names their problem (discount code, yesterday, full price), the resolution is stated up front (refunded $12), the next step carries a timeframe (5–7 business days) plus what to do if it fails, and the close is one line.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.