Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Audit a ContextOS proof-carrying run using RunContext, CompiledContext, ToolEnvelope, DecisionRecord, trace, scorecard, and ReplayPacket artifacts. Use for incident review, launch evidence, or record completeness; do not use for a whole-repository harness maturity audit.
.claude/skills/contextosai-contextos-run-audit/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 1997% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 68% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 16% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 41% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 49% | 0% |
Determine whether one governed claim or effect is actually supported by its execution artifacts. The audit rule is: no artifact, no pass.
Identify the run, decision, claimed outcome, target environment, and audit purpose. Accept equivalent artifact names in non-ContextOS stacks, but require equivalent evidence.
When the current ContextOS source is available, inspect the active types and published schemas before judging fields. Read references/proof-checklist.md for artifact invariants, severity, and the report shape.
Locate or request:
RunContext;CompiledContext;DecisionRecord and evaluator scorecard;Record an exact locator for every artifact: file and line, record ID, trace/span ID, content hash, or query result. A design document can explain intent but cannot prove runtime enforcement.
DecisionSpec; controls active at compile time survive into the record; scorecard thresholds are met.Score each applicable check:
PASS: runtime artifact directly proves the invariant.PARTIAL: a real control exists but coverage or evidence is incomplete.FAIL: the invariant is absent, contradicted, or bypassed.N/A: the surface genuinely does not exist for this run, with rationale.Do not convert missing artifacts to N/A. Treat unsupported, malformed, expired, or unverifiable values as fail-closed conditions.
Lead with the audit verdict and the highest-severity causal breaks. Include:
Do not mutate production state or replay live side effects during an audit unless the user explicitly authorizes a controlled environment.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 8,135 | 34,298 | +322% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 372 | 7,801 | +1997% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 24,135 | 32,734 | +36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,983 | 6,695 | +68% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 33,264 | 31,426 | -6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,034 | 5,842 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 25,739 | 21,743 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,854 | 5,175 | +34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 21,254 | 38,012 | +79% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,491 | 8,655 | +93% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 19,263 | 41,031 | +113% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,635 | 5,344 | +47% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 10,751 | 7,679 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,660 | 1,892 | +14% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 9,658 | 9,024 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,479 | 2,080 | +41% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 8,649 | 9,718 | +12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,215 | 2,233 | +84% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 22,707 | 9,680 | -57% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,700 | 2,224 | +31% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 9,376 | 8,332 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,349 | 2,006 | +49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 13,182 | 9,287 | -30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,842 | 1,908 | +4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | 12,125 | 16,404 | +35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,795 | 3,419 | +90% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 11,683 | 15,254 | +31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,773 | 3,009 | +70% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 26,592 | 12,904 | -51% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,082 | 2,649 | +145% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 11,350 | 8,371 | -26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,688 | 1,983 | +17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 5,550 | 7,600 | +37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 921 | 1,875 | +104% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 26,315 | 17,931 | -32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,087 | 3,413 | +214% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 12,098 | 9,070 | -25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,736 | 2,214 | +28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 12,273 | 8,141 | -34% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,980 | 2,054 | +4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 12,884 | 14,613 | +13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,109 | 3,054 | +45% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | 11,163 | 14,244 | +28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,692 | 3,184 | +88% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | pass→pass | 13,993 | 11,275 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,853 | 2,125 | +15% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted, and 20 counted toward the lift figure. The other 3 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +43 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 20 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.