Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Segment a SKU portfolio on value (ABC) and demand variability (XYZ), produce the 9-box with a planning policy per cell, and reallocate planner attention accordingly. Use when the user mentions ABC analysis, inventory segmentation, SKU rationalization, stok segmentasyonu, envanter sınıflandırma, or asks which items deserve forecasting effort. Differentiator - ABC alone is treated as half an answer; policy lives in the value x variability combination.
.claude/skills/davila7-abc-xyz-segmentation/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 19% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 20% | 0% |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 2% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 28% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 23% | 0% |
Value tells you where the money is. Variability tells you whether forecasting, buffering or restructuring can work. Never output a classification without the policy consequences.
Per-SKU demand history (sku, period, qty) covering 12+ periods, plus unit value (unit_price or cost). Without unit value, ABC degrades to a volume ranking - say so and ask for prices before presenting conclusions about money.
Worked example including a safety-stock stress test: https://github.com/gulmezeren2-byte/abc-xyz-inventory
Source: industrial-engineering-ai-skills by Eren Gulmez (MIT). The full method pack - entry skill, role agents, data-hygiene rules and artifact templates - lives there.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-03 | fail→pass | 11,774 | 10,021 | -15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,992 | 2,365 | +19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 23,123 | 19,909 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,021 | 4,053 | +1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 30,194 | 28,848 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,217 | 6,977 | +12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 22,277 | 8,820 | -60% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,891 | 2,267 | +20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 15,502 | 7,478 | -52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,576 | 2,025 | +28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 11,933 | 11,212 | -6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,117 | 2,599 | +23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 12,015 | 13,433 | +12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,260 | 3,074 | +36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 7,732 | 5,475 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,591 | 1,828 | +15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 12,827 | 12,983 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,332 | 3,034 | +30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 13,630 | 15,705 | +15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,552 | 3,363 | +32% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 12,003 | 8,319 | -31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,176 | 2,397 | +10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 12,168 | 10,284 | -15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,232 | 2,748 | +23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 13,582 | 12,837 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,413 | 3,234 | +34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 15,348 | 13,303 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,705 | 3,073 | +14% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 8,487 | 7,169 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,534 | 1,955 | +27% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 12,913 | 7,658 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,102 | 2,142 | +2% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 11,411 | 8,241 | -28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,015 | 2,119 | +5% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 3,688 | 3,400 | -8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 854 | 1,585 | +86% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 10,943 | 11,954 | +9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,146 | 3,155 | +47% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 4,439 | 5,886 | +33% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 913 | 1,881 | +106% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 10,809 | 7,317 | -32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,897 | 1,912 | +1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 7,402 | 4,764 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,671 | 1,610 | -4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | pass→pass | 5,272 | 1,994 | -62% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 920 | 1,115 | +21% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +13 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.