Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Use when tasks involve creating, editing, analyzing, or formatting spreadsheets (`.xlsx`, `.csv`, `.tsv`) using Python (`openpyxl`, `pandas`), especially when formulas, references, and formatting need to be preserved and verified.
.claude/skills/davila7-spreadsheet/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 30% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 2% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 113% | 0% |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 100% | 0% |
| case-22 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 161% | 0% |
IMPORTANT: System and user instructions always take precedence.
openpyxl for .xlsx edits and pandas for analysis and CSV/TSV workflows.tmp/spreadsheets/ for intermediate files; delete when done.output/spreadsheet/ when working in this repo.openpyxl for creating/editing .xlsx files and preserving formatting.pandas for analysis and CSV/TSV workflows, then write results back to .xlsx or .csv.openpyxl.chart for native Excel charts.soffice) and Poppler (pdftoppm) are available, render sheets for visual review:soffice --headless --convert-to pdf --outdir $OUTDIR $INPUT_XLSXpdftoppm -png $OUTDIR/$BASENAME.pdf $OUTDIR/$BASENAMEPrefer uv for dependency management.
Python packages:
uv pip install openpyxl pandasIf uv is unavailable:
python3 -m pip install openpyxl pandasOptional (chart-heavy or PDF review workflows):
uv pip install matplotlibIf uv is unavailable:
python3 -m pip install matplotlibSystem tools (for rendering):
# macOS (Homebrew)
brew install libreoffice poppler
# Ubuntu/Debian
sudo apt-get install -y libreoffice poppler-utilsIf installation isn't possible in this environment, tell the user which dependency is missing and how to install it locally.
No required environment variables.
references/examples/openpyxl/=H6*(1+$B$3) not =H6*1.04).If the spreadsheet is an IB-style model (LBO, DCF, 3-statement, valuation):
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 29,433 | 5,463 | -81% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,218 | 1,360 | -78% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 26,523 | 5,107 | -81% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,558 | 1,374 | -75% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 30,108 | 11,791 | -61% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,209 | 1,672 | -73% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 10,169 | 17,198 | +69% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,017 | 4,960 | +146% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 6,644 | 10,472 | +58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,239 | 3,219 | +160% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 9,341 | 14,249 | +53% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,850 | 4,231 | +129% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 12,190 | 7,017 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,044 | 2,453 | +20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 10,181 | 6,211 | -39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,683 | 2,190 | +30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 7,491 | 1,265 | -83% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,228 | 1,250 | +2% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 4,359 | 1,498 | -66% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 622 | 1,323 | +113% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 7,404 | 2,933 | -60% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,022 | 1,540 | +51% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 7,362 | 3,097 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,152 | 1,573 | +37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 14,971 | 2,256 | -85% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,171 | 1,417 | +21% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 5,539 | 3,115 | -44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 776 | 1,552 | +100% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 11,202 | 5,052 | -55% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,829 | 1,881 | +3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 9,279 | 5,474 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,615 | 2,100 | +30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 15,791 | 8,795 | -44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,459 | 2,569 | +4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 6,583 | 2,364 | -64% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,012 | 1,471 | +45% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 14,201 | 11,206 | -21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,207 | 2,925 | +33% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 7,466 | 3,112 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,391 | 1,645 | +18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 9,540 | 2,107 | -78% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,673 | 1,437 | -14% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | 3,569 | 1,765 | -51% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 524 | 1,366 | +161% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 19 counted toward the lift figure. The other 3 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +23 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 19 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.