Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Guide the PM-to-Director transition across preparing, interviewing, landing, and recalibrating. Use when leadership scope is changing and you need practical coaching.
.claude/skills/deanpeters-director-readiness-advisor/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 503% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 214% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 368% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 226% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 125% | 0% |
Guide PMs and Directors through the specific challenges of the PM-to-Director transition using adaptive questions and targeted coaching. Diagnoses where you are in the journey and delivers practical, war-story-backed guidance calibrated to your situation — not generic leadership advice.
This is not a readiness checklist. It's a coaching conversation that names what's actually hard, why it's hard, and what to do about it.
Works best with: Where you are in the PM-to-Director journey: preparing for the jump, interviewing, newly landed, or recalibrating after a rough start. Also useful: Your org context (team size, who you'd report to) and the specific friction you're feeling.
Anything supplied with the invocation itself — text after the skill name, a pasted context dump, or an appended ARGUMENTS: line — counts as answers already given. Use it and skip whatever it covers; don't re-ask.
Arriving empty-handed? That works too. The advisor opens by asking which of the four situations describes you, then branches.
Example invocation: I'm 60 days into a Director role and my old peers now report to me — it's awkward and I'm still doing PM work. Coach me.
The PM → Director transition looks different depending on where you are:
Each situation has distinct coaching priorities. The biggest mistake is applying "newly landed" advice to someone who's been in the role for two years, or "preparing" advice to someone mid-interview process.
This skill draws directly on the Altitude & Horizon Framework — see skills/altitude-horizon-framework/SKILL.md for the full mental model. Core concepts used here:
Use workshop-facilitation as the default interaction protocol for this skill.
It defines:
Other (specify) when useful)This file defines the domain-specific assessment content. If there is a conflict, follow this file's domain logic.
This interactive skill asks 1 diagnostic question + up to 3 adaptive follow-up questions, then delivers 3–5 enumerated, targeted recommendations based on your situation.
Agent says:
Before we start, you can choose how to run this session:
Agent asks (Q1/3):
"Where are you in the PM-to-Director journey?"
Or describe your situation directly.
Agent asks:
"What's the gap you most want to close before making the move?"
Or describe your main development area.
Agent asks:
"What's your runway — how close are you to making the move?"
Or describe your timeline.
Agent delivers (based on 1B + 1C):
Example output for 1B = Strategic narrative + 1C = 3–6 months:
"Based on your gap (strategic narrative) and timeline (3–6 months), here are your highest-leverage moves:
Choose a number to go deeper on any of these, or ask about something specific."
Agent asks:
"What's your interview context?"
Agent asks:
"What do you most want to work on for interview prep?"
Or describe what you most need.
Agent delivers (based on 2B + 2C):
Example output for 2B = External + 2C = Practicing responses:
"The most effective Director interview prep isn't memorizing answers — it's internalizing the thinking so it comes out naturally. These two skills are your prep tools:
altitude-horizon-framework as a study session — Don't just read it. After each section, pause and answer: 'Where have I operated at this altitude or horizon in my own work? What's my story here?' The Four Transition Zones and Named Failure Modes map almost directly to common Director interview questions.Choose a number to go deeper, or describe what you want to practice."
Agent asks:
"What's your most pressing challenge right now?"
Or describe what's most pressing.
Agent asks:
"What's your team situation?"
Agent delivers (based on 3B + 3C):
Example output for 3B = Direction is unclear + 3C = Inherited team:
"An inherited team without clear direction is the most common Director failure mode in the first 90 days. Here's what to do:
Choose a number to go deeper, or describe what's most blocking you."
Agent asks:
"What's the core friction? Where does the role feel most broken right now?"
Or describe what's not working.
Agent asks:
"How long have you been in this Director role?"
Agent delivers (based on 4B + 4C):
Example output for 4B = Still acting like a PM + 4C = 1–2 years:
"A Director who is still doing IC work after 12+ months isn't transitioning — they've settled into an unsustainable hybrid role. Here's the diagnosis and the fix:
Choose a number to go deeper, or tell me what you want to work on next."
See examples/conversation-flow.md for a full end-to-end interaction, including context intake, branch selection, and final recommendations.
Q1: "3 — Newly landed" Q2: "3 — Direction is unclear" Q3: "1 — Inherited an established team"
Agent output: Cascading Context Map instructions, advice on reframing 1-on-1s, naming ambiguity explicitly, and resisting premature reorganization. Links to altitude-horizon-framework for the full cascade template.
Q1: "1 — Preparing to make the leap" Q2: "3 — Strategic narrative" Q3: "2 — 3–6 months"
Agent output: 1-on-1 reframe tactics, cascade habit-building exercise, Hero Syndrome audit, and warning against over-indexing on Director thinking while still in PM role.
Symptom: Asking "what do I need to do to get promoted?" and working through items like tasks
Consequence: You optimize for appearances of readiness rather than building the actual muscles. Interviewers and managers can tell the difference.
Fix: Use this advisor to identify the one or two specific behavior changes that matter most for your situation, not a comprehensive development program.
Symptom: Selecting "preparing" when you're actually in an active interview process, or selecting "newly landed" when you've been in the role 18 months
Consequence: You get coaching calibrated to the wrong situation.
Fix: Be honest about where you actually are, not where you'd like to be.
Symptom: Asking this advisor whether you're "ready" for the transition
Consequence: There's no readiness test. The transition is a decision, not a graduation.
Fix: Use this skill to identify what will be hardest for you specifically and how to address it — not to get a pass/fail verdict.
skills/altitude-horizon-framework/SKILL.md — The mental model this skill coaches on; includes the Cascading Context Map templateskills/workshop-facilitation/SKILL.md — Facilitation protocol for this interactive skilldirector-to-vp-cpo-advisor (planned) — Coaches the next transition: Director to VP or CPO of Product| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 4,530 | 2,216 | -51% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 799 | 4,817 | +503% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 12,682 | 10,654 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,950 | 6,126 | +214% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 6,665 | 6,034 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,149 | 5,383 | +368% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 11,673 | 9,167 | -21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,796 | 5,861 | +226% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 12,904 | 9,211 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,132 | 5,710 | +168% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 15,509 | 8,458 | -45% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,543 | 5,727 | +125% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 16,239 | 7,161 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,463 | 5,386 | +119% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 16,398 | 72,758 | +344% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,604 | 6,231 | +139% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 14,815 | 45,395 | +206% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,356 | 5,870 | +149% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 19,634 | 12,142 | -38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,958 | 6,237 | +111% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 15,654 | 8,173 | -48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,402 | 5,728 | +138% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 4,381 | 2,231 | -49% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 609 | 4,701 | +672% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 15,052 | 8,913 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,105 | 5,723 | +172% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 59,075 | 9,677 | -84% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,323 | 5,892 | +154% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 2,258 | 2,560 | +13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 366 | 4,846 | +1224% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 14,047 | 8,909 | -37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,195 | 5,820 | +165% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 14,999 | 8,886 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,207 | 5,642 | +156% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | 16,942 | 8,755 | -48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,596 | 5,709 | +120% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→fail | 20,831 | 24,493 | +18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,741 | 8,683 | +132% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 5,924 | 4,210 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,349 | 5,215 | +287% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 7,891 | 7,499 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,348 | 5,484 | +307% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | 17,136 | 9,354 | -45% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,540 | 5,819 | +129% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +36 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.