Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Deobfuscates malicious JavaScript code used in web-based attacks, phishing pages, and dropper scripts by reversing encoding layers, eval chains, string manipulation, and control flow obfuscation to reveal the original malicious logic. Activates for requests involving JavaScript malware analysis, script deobfuscation, web skimmer analysis, or obfuscated dropper investigation.
.claude/skills/deobfuscating-javascript-malware/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Do not use for obfuscated JavaScript that is merely minified production code; use a standard beautifier instead.
jsbeautifier library for code formattingIsolate the malicious JavaScript without executing it:
bash# Extract JavaScript from HTML file python3 << 'PYEOF' from html.parser import HTMLParser class ScriptExtractor(HTMLParser): def __init__(self): super().__init__() self.in_script = False self.scripts = [] self.current = "" def handle_starttag(self, tag, attrs): if tag == "script": self.in_script = True self.current = "" def handle_endtag(self, tag): if tag == "script": self.in_script = False if self.current.strip(): self.scripts.append(self.current) def handle_data(self, data): if self.in_script: self.current += data with open("malicious_page.html") as f: parser = ScriptExtractor() parser.feed(f.read()) for i, script in enumerate(parser.scripts): with open(f"script_{i}.js", "w") as f: f.write(script) print(f"Extracted script_{i}.js ({len(script)} bytes)") PYEOF # Beautify the extracted JavaScript npx js-beautify script_0.js -o script_0_pretty.js
Categorize the obfuscation methods used:
Common JavaScript Obfuscation Techniques:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
String Encoding:
- Hex encoding: "\x68\x65\x6c\x6c\x6f" -> "hello"
- Unicode escapes: "\u0068\u0065\u006c\u006c\u006f" -> "hello"
- Base64: atob("aGVsbG8=") -> "hello"
- charCodeAt/fromCharCode: String.fromCharCode(104,101,108,108,111)
- Array-based lookup: var _0x1234 = ["hello","world"]; _0x1234[0]
Eval Chains:
- eval(atob("..."))
- eval(unescape("..."))
- new Function("return " + decoded)()
- document.write("<script>" + decoded + "</script>")
- setTimeout(decoded, 0)
Control Flow:
- Switch-case dispatcher with shuffled case order
- Opaque predicates (always-true/false conditions)
- Dead code insertion
- Variable name mangling (_0x4a3b, _0xab12)
Anti-Analysis:
- Debugger traps: setInterval(function(){debugger;}, 100)
- Console detection: overriding console.log
- Timing checks: performance.now() deltas
- DevTools detection: window.outerWidth - window.innerWidth > 100Neutralize anti-debugging and anti-analysis traps:
javascript// Remove debugger traps before analysis // Replace in the obfuscated script: // Before: setInterval(function() { debugger; }, 100); // After (neutralized): setInterval(function() { /* debugger removed */ }, 100); // Neutralize DevTools detection // Before: if (window.outerWidth - window.innerWidth > 160) { window.location = "about:blank"; } // After: if (false) { window.location = "about:blank"; } // Neutralize timing checks // Override performance.now to return consistent values const originalNow = performance.now; performance.now = function() { return 0; };
Progressively decode encoded strings:
python# Python script to decode common JS obfuscation patterns import re import base64 import urllib.parse def decode_hex_strings(code): """Replace \\xNN sequences with ASCII characters""" def hex_replace(match): hex_str = match.group(0) try: return bytes.fromhex(hex_str.replace("\\x", "")).decode("ascii") except: return hex_str return re.sub(r'(?:\\x[0-9a-fA-F]{2})+', hex_replace, code) def decode_unicode_escapes(code): """Replace \\uNNNN sequences with characters""" def unicode_replace(match): return chr(int(match.group(1), 16)) return re.sub(r'\\u([0-9a-fA-F]{4})', unicode_replace, code) def decode_charcode_arrays(code): """Resolve String.fromCharCode calls""" def charcode_replace(match): codes = [int(c.strip()) for c in match.group(1).split(",")] return '"' + "".join(chr(c) for c in codes) + '"' return re.sub(r'String\.fromCharCode\(([0-9,\s]+)\)', charcode_replace, code) def decode_base64_strings(code): """Resolve atob() calls with static strings""" def atob_replace(match): try: decoded = base64.b64decode(match.group(1)).decode("utf-8") return f'"{decoded}"' except: return match.group(0) return re.sub(r'atob\(["\']([A-Za-z0-9+/=]+)["\']\)', atob_replace, code) # Apply all decoders with open("script_0.js") as f: code = f.read() code = decode_hex_strings(code) code = decode_unicode_escapes(code) code = decode_charcode_arrays(code) code = decode_base64_strings(code) with open("script_0_decoded.js", "w") as f: f.write(code) print("Decoded strings written to script_0_decoded.js")
Unwrap eval/Function constructor chains without executing:
javascript// Node.js script to safely resolve eval chains // Run in isolated environment: node --experimental-vm-modules deobfuscate.js const vm = require('vm'); // Create sandboxed context with logging const sandbox = { eval: function(code) { console.log("=== EVAL INTERCEPTED ==="); console.log(code.substring(0, 500)); console.log("========================"); return code; // Return the code instead of executing it }, document: { write: function(html) { console.log("=== DOCUMENT.WRITE INTERCEPTED ==="); console.log(html.substring(0, 500)); }, getElementById: function() { return { innerHTML: "" }; } }, window: { location: { href: "" } }, atob: function(s) { return Buffer.from(s, 'base64').toString(); }, unescape: unescape, setTimeout: function(fn) { if (typeof fn === 'string') console.log("TIMEOUT CODE:", fn); }, console: console, String: String, Array: Array, parseInt: parseInt, RegExp: RegExp, }; const context = vm.createContext(sandbox); // Load and execute the obfuscated script in sandbox const fs = require('fs'); const code = fs.readFileSync('script_0.js', 'utf8'); try { vm.runInContext(code, context, { timeout: 5000 }); } catch(e) { console.log("Execution error (expected):", e.message); }
Examine the revealed malicious logic:
Deobfuscated Malware Categories and IOC Extraction:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Credential Harvester:
- Form action URLs (exfiltration endpoints)
- XMLHttpRequest/fetch destinations
- Targeted input field names (username, password, cc_number)
Web Skimmer (Magecart):
- Payment form overlay injection
- Card data exfiltration URLs
- Keylogger event listeners (onkeypress, oninput)
Redirect Script:
- Destination URLs in location.href assignments
- Conditional redirects based on user-agent or referrer
- Cloaking logic (show benign content to bots)
Exploit Kit Landing:
- Browser/plugin version checks
- Exploit payload URLs
- Shellcode embedded as arrays or encoded strings| Term | Definition | |------|------------| | Eval Chain | Nested layers of eval(), Function(), or document.write() calls that each decode one layer of obfuscation before passing to the next | | String Array Rotation | Obfuscation technique storing all strings in a shuffled array and accessing them by computed index to hide string literals | | Dead Code Insertion | Adding non-functional code blocks that never execute to increase analysis complexity and confuse pattern matching | | Opaque Predicate | Conditional expression whose outcome is predetermined but difficult to determine statically; used to obscure control flow | | Anti-Debugging | JavaScript techniques to detect and thwart browser DevTools or debugger usage including debugger statements and timing checks | | Web Skimmer | Malicious JavaScript injected into e-commerce sites to steal payment card data from checkout forms (Magecart attack) |
Context: A compromised e-commerce site has obfuscated JavaScript injected into its checkout page. The script needs deobfuscation to identify the data exfiltration endpoint and determine what customer data was stolen.
Approach:
Pitfalls:
JAVASCRIPT MALWARE DEOBFUSCATION REPORT
=========================================
Source: checkout.js (injected into example-shop.com)
Obfuscation: obfuscator.io (string array + rotation + hex encoding)
Layers Removed: 3
OBFUSCATION TECHNIQUES IDENTIFIED
[1] String array with 247 entries, rotated by 0x1a3
[2] Hex-encoded string references (\x68\x65\x6c\x6c\x6f)
[3] Base64-wrapped eval chain (2 layers)
[4] Anti-debugging: setInterval debugger trap
DEOBFUSCATED FUNCTIONALITY
Type: Magecart Payment Card Skimmer
Target Forms: input[name*="card"], input[name*="cc_"]
Data Captured: Card number, expiration, CVV, cardholder name
Exfil Method: POST via XMLHttpRequest
Exfil URL: hxxps://analytics-cdn[.]com/collect
Exfil Format: JSON { "cn": card_number, "exp": expiry, "cv": cvv }
Trigger: Form submit event on checkout page
EXTRACTED IOCs
Domains: analytics-cdn[.]com
IPs: 185.220.101[.]42
URLs: hxxps://analytics-cdn[.]com/collect
hxxps://analytics-cdn[.]com/gate.js| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-23 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +22 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.