Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Validate AI/ML models and datasets for bias, fairness, and ethical concerns. Use when auditing AI systems for ethical compliance, fairness assessment, or bias detection. Trigger with phrases like "evaluate model fairness", "check for bias", or "validate AI ethics".
.claude/skills/dicklesworthstone-validating-ai-ethics-and-fairness/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 19% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 12% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 21% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 23% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 31% | 0% |
This skill provides automated assistance for ai ethics validator tasks.
Before using this skill, ensure you have:
Determine which aspects of the AI system require ethical validation:
Use the skill to examine the AI system:
The skill produces a comprehensive report including:
Based on findings, apply recommended strategies:
The skill generates structured reports containing:
Common issues and solutions:
Insufficient Data
Missing Sensitive Attributes
Conflicting Fairness Criteria
Data Quality Issues
This skill provides automated assistance for ai ethics validator tasks. This skill provides automated assistance for the described functionality.
Example usage patterns will be demonstrated in context.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-17 | pass→pass | 17,980 | 19,221 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,152 | 3,078 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 31,751 | 34,746 | +9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,249 | 6,532 | +24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 22,512 | 21,555 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,814 | 3,344 | +19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 17,793 | 14,340 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,890 | 2,126 | +12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 18,969 | 15,235 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,354 | 2,533 | +8% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 18,922 | 12,589 | -33% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,248 | 1,950 | -13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 25,422 | 21,315 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,157 | 3,526 | +12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 35,959 | 21,525 | -40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,861 | 3,618 | +26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 20,657 | 31,402 | +52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,504 | 3,024 | +21% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 21,360 | 21,468 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,559 | 3,149 | +23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 20,869 | 17,515 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,462 | 2,876 | +17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 18,766 | 19,268 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,128 | 2,791 | +31% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 17,262 | 14,332 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,928 | 2,012 | +4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 20,765 | 17,861 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,419 | 2,973 | +23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 17,874 | 12,945 | -28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,810 | 1,908 | +5% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 20,992 | 16,729 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,848 | 2,711 | -5% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 14,492 | 14,443 | -0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,525 | 2,180 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 9,627 | 9,951 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 784 | 1,519 | +94% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 16,504 | 14,201 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,863 | 2,181 | +17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | 17,740 | 19,589 | +10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,465 | 3,243 | +32% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | 24,337 | 18,038 | -26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,333 | 3,216 | -4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | 14,558 | 18,968 | +30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 998 | 2,404 | +141% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | fail→fail | 33,984 | 19,568 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,697 | 3,126 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +22 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.