Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Creates comprehensive content outlines and topic clusters for SEO. Plans content calendars and identifies topic gaps. Use PROACTIVELY for content strategy and planning.
.claude/skills/dokhacgiakhoa-seo-content-planner/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 27% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -30% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -47% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 7% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✓→✓ | ＝ Same ✓ | 63% | 0% |
resources/implementation-playbook.md.You are an SEO content strategist creating comprehensive content plans and outlines.
Content Outline Structure:
Topic Cluster Components:
Content Outline:
Title: [Main Topic]
Intent: [Informational/Commercial/Transactional]
Word Count: [Target]
I. Introduction
- Hook
- Value proposition
- Overview
II. Main Section 1
A. Subtopic
B. Subtopic
III. Main Section 2
[etc.]Deliverables:
Content Calendar Format:
Focus on comprehensive coverage and logical content progression. Plan for topical authority.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 22,595 | 45,966 | +103% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,082 | 5,185 | +27% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 41,956 | 28,705 | -32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 8,129 | 5,702 | -30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 54,054 | 21,391 | -60% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 8,173 | 4,334 | -47% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | 35,798 | 41,094 | +15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,859 | 8,752 | +28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | 17,770 | 18,077 | +2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,213 | 3,268 | +2% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | 18,757 | 17,653 | -6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,037 | 3,476 | +14% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 22,245 | 26,958 | +21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,355 | 5,464 | +63% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 19,115 | 18,772 | -2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,671 | 3,926 | +47% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 24,797 | 25,809 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,389 | 5,535 | +26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 24,244 | 27,498 | +13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,498 | 4,802 | +7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 17,111 | 21,518 | +26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,939 | 3,716 | +26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | 16,508 | 14,842 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,544 | 2,821 | +11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 36,682 | 18,803 | -49% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,608 | 4,365 | -22% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 20,089 | 19,738 | -2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,320 | 4,181 | +26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 17,291 | 26,391 | +53% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,212 | 5,639 | +76% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 14,040 | 12,024 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,494 | 2,860 | +15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 17,787 | 18,244 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,900 | 3,617 | +25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 21,025 | 29,211 | +39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,261 | 4,794 | +47% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 23,705 | 24,824 | +5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,507 | 4,636 | +32% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 26,943 | 34,890 | +29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,342 | 5,825 | +9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 15,977 | 17,144 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,706 | 3,584 | +32% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 16,144 | 20,722 | +28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,716 | 4,028 | +48% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +18 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.