Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →evolution-foundation/dev-ultraqa
QA cycling workflow — repeat build/lint/test/fix cycles up to 5 times until all checks pass. Stops early if the same error repeats 3 times (signals a fundamental issue, not a fixable one).
Passed 16 of 20 test cases with the skill, and 3 of 20 without it.
and 17 more in the full report
14 fixed4 passed either way5 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 13 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
In cycle 1, the build step succeeded, but the lint step failed. An executor agent resolved the lint issue. What is the immediate next step in the workflow?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The response loops back to step 1 (build) for the next cycle. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Derived from oh-my-claudecode (MIT, Yeachan Heo). Adapted for the EvoNexus Engineering Layer.
QA cycling: keep running build/lint/test/fix loops until all checks pass — but with a circuit breaker. If the same error persists across 3 cycles, stop and report: it's a fundamental issue, not a fixable one.
dev-autopilot or @bolt-executor)dev-verify once@apex-architect, don't loopnpm run build, cargo build, go build)npm run lint, cargo clippy, golangci-lint)npm test, cargo test, pytest)@oath-verifier for final verification@bolt-executor or @hawk-debugger to fix the failureIf the same error fingerprint (file:line + error message) appears in 3 consecutive cycles:
@apex-architect with full context dumpSaved to workspace/development/verifications/[C]ultraqa-{component}-{date}.md:
## UltraQA Report
test cases passed, vs 3 / 20 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.