Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Comprehensive technology-agnostic prompt for analyzing and documenting project folder structures. Auto-detects project types (.NET, Java, React, Angular, Python, Node.js, Flutter), generates detailed blueprints with visualization options, naming conventions, file placement patterns, and extension templates for maintaining consistent code organization across diverse technology stacks.
.claude/skills/folder-structure-blueprint-generator/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
${PROJECT_TYPE="Auto-detect|.NET|Java|React|Angular|Python|Node.js|Flutter|Other"} <!-- Select primary technology -->
${INCLUDES_MICROSERVICES="Auto-detect|true|false"} <!-- Is this a microservices architecture? -->
${INCLUDES_FRONTEND="Auto-detect|true|false"} <!-- Does project include frontend components? -->
${IS_MONOREPO="Auto-detect|true|false"} <!-- Is this a monorepo with multiple projects? -->
${VISUALIZATION_STYLE="ASCII|Markdown List|Table"} <!-- How to visualize the structure -->
${DEPTH_LEVEL=1-5} <!-- How many levels of folders to document in detail -->
${INCLUDE_FILE_COUNTS=true|false} <!-- Include file count statistics -->
${INCLUDE_GENERATED_FOLDERS=true|false} <!-- Include auto-generated folders -->
${INCLUDE_FILE_PATTERNS=true|false} <!-- Document file naming/location patterns -->
${INCLUDE_TEMPLATES=true|false} <!-- Include file/folder templates for new features -->
"Analyze the project's folder structure and create a comprehensive 'Project_Folders_Structure_Blueprint.md' document that serves as a definitive guide for maintaining consistent code organization. Use the following approach:
${PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect" ? "Begin by scanning the folder structure for key files that identify the project type:
"Focus analysis on ${PROJECT_TYPE} project structure"}
${IS_MONOREPO == "Auto-detect" ? "Determine if this is a monorepo by looking for:
${INCLUDES_MICROSERVICES == "Auto-detect" ? "Check for microservices architecture indicators:
${INCLUDES_FRONTEND == "Auto-detect" ? "Identify frontend components by looking for:
Provide a high-level overview of the ${PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect" ? "detected project type(s)" : PROJECT_TYPE} project's organization principles and folder structure:
${IS_MONOREPO == "Auto-detect" ? "If detected as a monorepo, explain how the monorepo is organized and the relationship between projects." : IS_MONOREPO ? "Explain how the monorepo is organized and the relationship between projects." : ""}
${INCLUDES_MICROSERVICES == "Auto-detect" ? "If microservices are detected, describe how they are structured and organized." : INCLUDES_MICROSERVICES ? "Describe how the microservices are structured and organized." : ""}
${VISUALIZATION_STYLE == "ASCII" ? "Create an ASCII tree representation of the folder hierarchy to depth level ${DEPTH_LEVEL}." : ""}
${VISUALIZATION_STYLE == "Markdown List" ? "Use nested markdown lists to represent the folder hierarchy to depth level ${DEPTH_LEVEL}." : ""}
${VISUALIZATION_STYLE == "Table" ? "Create a table with columns for Path, Purpose, Content Types, and Conventions." : ""}
${INCLUDE_GENERATED_FOLDERS ? "Include all folders including generated ones." : "Exclude auto-generated folders like bin/, obj/, node_modules/, etc."}
Document each significant directory's purpose, contents, and patterns:
${PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect" ? "For each detected technology, analyze directory structures based on observed usage patterns:" : ""}
${(PROJECT_TYPE == ".NET" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect") ? "#### .NET Project Structure (if detected)
${(PROJECT_TYPE == "React" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Angular" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect") ? "#### UI Project Structure (if detected)
${INCLUDE_FILE_PATTERNS ? "Document the patterns that determine where different types of files should be placed:
"Document where key file types are located in the project."}
Document the naming and organizational conventions observed across the project:
Provide guidance for navigating and working with the codebase structure:
${INCLUDE_FILE_COUNTS ? "- Content Statistics:
Document the build process and output organization:
${(PROJECT_TYPE == ".NET" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect") ? "#### .NET-Specific Structure Patterns (if detected)
${(PROJECT_TYPE == "Java" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect") ? "#### Java-Specific Structure Patterns (if detected)
${(PROJECT_TYPE == "Node.js" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect") ? "#### Node.js-Specific Structure Patterns (if detected)
Document how the project structure is designed to be extended:
${INCLUDE_TEMPLATES ? "### 10. Structure Templates
Provide templates for creating new components that follow project conventions:
Document how the project structure is maintained and enforced:
Include a section at the end about maintaining this blueprint and when it was last updated. "
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-23 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +65 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.