Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Comprehensive technology stack blueprint generator that analyzes codebases to create detailed architectural documentation. Automatically detects technology stacks, programming languages, and implementation patterns across multiple platforms (.NET, Java, JavaScript, React, Python). Generates configurable blueprints with version information, licensing details, usage patterns, coding conventions, and visual diagrams. Provides implementation-ready templates and maintains architectural consistency fo
.claude/skills/technology-stack-blueprint-generator/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-22 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-21 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
${PROJECT_TYPE="Auto-detect|.NET|Java|JavaScript|React.js|React Native|Angular|Python|Other"} <!-- Primary technology --> ${DEPTH_LEVEL="Basic|Standard|Comprehensive|Implementation-Ready"} <!-- Analysis depth --> ${INCLUDE_VERSIONS=true|false} <!-- Include version information --> ${INCLUDE_LICENSES=true|false} <!-- Include license information --> ${INCLUDE_DIAGRAMS=true|false} <!-- Generate architecture diagrams --> ${INCLUDE_USAGE_PATTERNS=true|false} <!-- Include code usage patterns --> ${INCLUDE_CONVENTIONS=true|false} <!-- Document coding conventions --> ${OUTPUT_FORMAT="Markdown|JSON|YAML|HTML"} <!-- Select output format --> ${CATEGORIZATION="Technology Type|Layer|Purpose"} <!-- Organization method -->
"Analyze the codebase and generate a ${DEPTH_LEVEL} technology stack blueprint that thoroughly documents technologies and implementation patterns to facilitate consistent code generation. Use the following approach:
${PROJECT_TYPE == ".NET" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect" ? "#### .NET Stack Analysis (if detected)
${PROJECT_TYPE == "Java" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect" ? "#### Java Stack Analysis (if detected)
${PROJECT_TYPE == "JavaScript" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect" ? "#### JavaScript Stack Analysis (if detected)
${PROJECT_TYPE == "React.js" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect" ? "#### React Analysis (if detected)
${PROJECT_TYPE == "Python" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect" ? "#### Python Analysis (if detected)
${INCLUDE_CONVENTIONS ? "Document coding conventions and patterns for each technology area:
${INCLUDE_USAGE_PATTERNS ? "Extract representative code examples showing standard implementation patterns:
${DEPTH_LEVEL == "Comprehensive" || DEPTH_LEVEL == "Implementation-Ready" ? "Create a comprehensive technology map including:
${PROJECT_TYPE == ".NET" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect" ? "#### .NET Implementation Details (if detected)
${PROJECT_TYPE == "React.js" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect" ? "#### React Implementation Details (if detected)
${DEPTH_LEVEL == "Implementation-Ready" ? "Based on the analysis, provide a detailed blueprint for implementing new features:
${INCLUDE_DIAGRAMS ? "### 8. Technology Relationship Diagrams
Format the output as ${OUTPUT_FORMAT} and categorize technologies by ${CATEGORIZATION}.
Save the output as 'Technology_Stack_Blueprint.${OUTPUT_FORMAT == "Markdown" ? "md" : OUTPUT_FORMAT.toLowerCase()}' "
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 19 counted toward the lift figure. The other 3 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +41 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 19 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.