Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Comprehensive technology-agnostic prompt generator for documenting end-to-end application workflows. Automatically detects project architecture patterns, technology stacks, and data flow patterns to generate detailed implementation blueprints covering entry points, service layers, data access, error handling, and testing approaches across multiple technologies including .NET, Java/Spring, React, and microservices architectures.
.claude/skills/project-workflow-analysis-blueprint-generator/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-20 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-12 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
${PROJECT_TYPE="Auto-detect|.NET|Java|Spring|Node.js|Python|React|Angular|Microservices|Other"}
<!-- Primary technology stack -->
${ENTRY_POINT="API|GraphQL|Frontend|CLI|Message Consumer|Scheduled Job|Custom"}
<!-- Starting point for the flow -->
${PERSISTENCE_TYPE="Auto-detect|SQL Database|NoSQL Database|File System|External API|Message Queue|Cache|None"}
<!-- Data storage type -->
${ARCHITECTURE_PATTERN="Auto-detect|Layered|Clean|CQRS|Microservices|MVC|MVVM|Serverless|Event-Driven|Other"}
<!-- Primary architecture pattern -->
${WORKFLOW_COUNT=1-5}
<!-- Number of workflows to document -->
${DETAIL_LEVEL="Standard|Implementation-Ready"}
<!-- Level of implementation detail to include -->
${INCLUDE_SEQUENCE_DIAGRAM=true|false}
<!-- Generate sequence diagram -->
${INCLUDE_TEST_PATTERNS=true|false}
<!-- Include testing approach -->"Analyze the codebase and document ${WORKFLOW_COUNT} representative end-to-end workflows
that can serve as implementation templates for similar features. Use the following approach:${PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect" ?
"Begin by examining the codebase structure to identify technologies:
- Check for .NET solutions/projects, Spring configurations, Node.js/Express files, etc.
- Identify the primary programming language(s) and frameworks in use
- Determine the architectural patterns based on folder structure and key components"
: "Focus on ${PROJECT_TYPE} patterns and conventions"}${ENTRY_POINT == "Auto-detect" ?
"Identify typical entry points by looking for:
- API controllers or route definitions
- GraphQL resolvers
- UI components that initiate network requests
- Message handlers or event subscribers
- Scheduled job definitions"
: "Focus on ${ENTRY_POINT} entry points"}${PERSISTENCE_TYPE == "Auto-detect" ?
"Determine persistence mechanisms by examining:
- Database context/connection configurations
- Repository implementations
- ORM mappings
- External API clients
- File system interactions"
: "Focus on ${PERSISTENCE_TYPE} interactions"}For each of the ${WORKFLOW_COUNT} most representative workflow(s) in the system:
API Entry Points:
${ENTRY_POINT == "API" || ENTRY_POINT == "Auto-detect" ?
"- Document the API controller class and method that receives the request
- Show the complete method signature including attributes/annotations
- Include the full request DTO/model class definition
- Document validation attributes and custom validators
- Show authentication/authorization attributes and checks" : ""}GraphQL Entry Points:
${ENTRY_POINT == "GraphQL" || ENTRY_POINT == "Auto-detect" ?
"- Document the GraphQL resolver class and method
- Show the complete schema definition for the query/mutation
- Include input type definitions
- Show resolver method implementation with parameter handling" : ""}Frontend Entry Points:
${ENTRY_POINT == "Frontend" || ENTRY_POINT == "Auto-detect" ?
"- Document the component that initiates the API call
- Show the event handler that triggers the request
- Include the API client service method
- Show state management code related to the request" : ""}Message Consumer Entry Points:
${ENTRY_POINT == "Message Consumer" || ENTRY_POINT == "Auto-detect" ?
"- Document the message handler class and method
- Show message subscription configuration
- Include the complete message model definition
- Show deserialization and validation logic" : ""}CQRS Patterns:
${ARCHITECTURE_PATTERN == "CQRS" || ARCHITECTURE_PATTERN == "Auto-detect" ?
"- Include complete command/query handler implementations" : ""}Clean Architecture Patterns:
${ARCHITECTURE_PATTERN == "Clean" || ARCHITECTURE_PATTERN == "Auto-detect" ?
"- Show use case/interactor implementations" : ""}SQL Database Patterns:
${PERSISTENCE_TYPE == "SQL Database" || PERSISTENCE_TYPE == "Auto-detect" ?
"- Include ORM configurations, annotations, or Fluent API usage
- Show actual SQL queries or ORM statements" : ""}NoSQL Database Patterns:
${PERSISTENCE_TYPE == "NoSQL Database" || PERSISTENCE_TYPE == "Auto-detect" ?
"- Show document structure definitions
- Include document query/update operations" : ""}Testing Approach (Optional):
${INCLUDE_TEST_PATTERNS ?
"9. **Testing Approach**
- Document unit test implementations for each layer
- Show mocking patterns and test fixture setup
- Include integration test implementations
- Document test data generation approaches
- Show API/controller test implementations" : ""}Sequence Diagram (Optional):
${INCLUDE_SEQUENCE_DIAGRAM ?
"10. **Sequence Diagram**
- Generate a detailed sequence diagram showing all components
- Include method calls with parameter types
- Show return values between components
- Document conditional flows and error paths" : ""}Document consistent patterns for:
EntityNameController)EntityNameService)IEntityNameRepository)EntityNameRequest, EntityNameResponse)Provide reusable code templates for:
.NET Implementation Patterns (if detected):
${PROJECT_TYPE == ".NET" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect" ?
"- Complete controller class with attributes, filters, and dependency injection
- Service registration in Startup.cs or Program.cs
- Entity Framework DbContext configuration
- Repository implementation with EF Core or Dapper
- AutoMapper profile configurations
- Middleware implementations for cross-cutting concerns
- Extension method patterns
- Options pattern implementation for configuration
- Logging implementation with ILogger
- Authentication/authorization filter or policy implementations" : ""}Spring Implementation Patterns (if detected):
${PROJECT_TYPE == "Java" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Spring" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect" ?
"- Complete controller class with annotations and dependency injection
- Service implementation with transaction boundaries
- Repository interface and implementation
- JPA entity definitions with relationships
- DTO class implementations
- Bean configuration and component scanning
- Exception handler implementations
- Custom validator implementations" : ""}React Implementation Patterns (if detected):
${PROJECT_TYPE == "React" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect" ?
"- Component structure with props and state
- Hook implementation patterns (useState, useEffect, custom hooks)
- API service implementation
- State management patterns (Context, Redux)
- Form handling implementations
- Route configuration" : ""}Based on the documented workflows, provide specific guidance for implementing new features:
Conclusion: Conclude with a summary of the most important patterns that should be followed when implementing new features to maintain consistency with the codebase."
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +18 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 2 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.